Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609501›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2015

Study protocol: transforming outcomes for patients through medical home evaluation and redesign: a cluster randomized controlled trial to test high value elements for patient-centered medical homes versus quality improvement.

David A Dorr, Kenneth John McConnell, Marsha Pierre-Jacques Williams, Kimberley A Gray, Jesse Wagner, Lyle J Fagnan, Elizabeth Malcolm

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02106221 (Transforming Outcomes for Patients Through Medical Home Evaluation & reDesign), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02106221 phase3completednot on this map

Transforming Outcomes for Patients Through Medical Home Evaluation & reDesign

TypeinterventionalSponsorCare Management PlusRan2011 to 2015Enrolled65,500ConditionsNurse Based Care Management, Health Information TechnologyArmsIntervention, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A Randomized Trial of High-Value Change Using Practice Facilitation.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A DorrOregon Health and Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA. dorrd@ohsu.edu.
Kenneth John McConnellOregon Health and Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA. mcconnjo@ohsu.edu.
Marsha Pierre-Jacques WilliamsOregon Health and Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA. pierreja@ohsu.edu.
Kimberley A GrayOregon Health and Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA. followkim@gmail.com.
Jesse WagnerOregon Health and Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA. wagnerje@ohsu.edu.
Lyle J FagnanOregon Health and Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA. fagnanl@ohsu.edu.
Elizabeth MalcolmStanford University, Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, USA. malcolm1@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care in the United States is in the midst of a near perfect storm: strong cost pressures, dramatic redesign efforts like patient-centered medical homes and accountable care organizations, and a broad series of payment and eligibility reforms. To date, alternative models of care intended to reduce costs and improve outcomes have shown mixed effects in the U.S., in part due to the difficulty of performing rigorous evaluation studies that control for the broader transformation while avoiding other biases, such as organizational or clinic effect on individual patient outcomes. Our objective is to test whether clinics assigned to achieve high value elements (HVEs) of practice redesign are more likely than controls to achieve improvements in patient health and satisfaction with care and reduction in costs. METHODS/

designTo prepare, we interview stakeholders, align with health reform, and propose a pilot. Participants are primary care clinics engaged in reform. Study protocol requires that both arms receive monthly practice facilitation, IT-based milestone reporting, and small financial incentives based on self-determined quality improvement (QI) goals; intervention receives additional prompting to choose HVEs. Design is a cluster randomized controlled trial over 1 year with pre- and post-washout periods. Outcomes are unplanned utilization and costs, patient experience of care, quality, and team performance. Analysis is a multivariate difference-in-difference with adjustments for patient risk, intraclinic correlation, and other confounders. DISCUSSION: The TOPMED study is a cluster randomized controlled trial focused on learning how primary care practices can transform within health reform guidelines to achieve outcomes related to the Triple Aim.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02106221.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionProgram EvaluationQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25609501
PMCPMC4307890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.