ArticleBMC health services research2015
Treatment variation in patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in Alberta from 2002 to 2010: a population-based study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation in Alberta of an administrative data algorithm to identify cancer recurrence.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Trial
- Regional Variations in Guideline Concordance for Women with Triple-Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancer in Nova Scotia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the breast cancer quality of care indicators in Iran; multicenter study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Treatment outcomes and the associated factors among breast cancer patients in Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- 360 Health Analysis (H360)-A Comparison of Key Performance Indicators in Breast Cancer Management across Health Institution Settings in Portugal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Trends in surgery and adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study in Queensland, Australia.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Trends in the Cost of Cancer Care: Beyond Drugs.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Review
- Compliance with clinical guidelines for breast cancer management: A population-based study of quality-of-care indicators in France.PloS one · 2019Article
- Geographical Inequalities in Surgical Treatment for Localized Female Breast Cancer, Queensland, Australia 1997-2011: Improvements over Time but Inequalities Remain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Factors related to breast cancer detection mode and time to diagnosis in Alberta, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Survival in stage I-III breast cancer patients by surgical treatment in a publicly funded health care system.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is generally the preferred treatment for women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of patients who receive BCS versus mastectomy and post-BCS radiotherapy, and explore factors associated with receipt of these treatments in Alberta, Canada.
methodsA retrospective population-based study was conducted that including all patients surgically treated with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed in Alberta from 2002-2010. Clinical characteristics, treatment information and patient age at diagnosis were collected from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Log binomial multiple regression was used to calculate stage-specific relative risk estimates of receiving BCS and post-BCS radiotherapy.
resultsOf the 14 646 patients included in the study, 44% received BCS, and of those, 88% received post-BCS radiotherapy. The adjusted relative risk of BCS was highest in Calgary and lowest in Central Alberta for all disease stages. Relative to surgeries performed in Calgary, those performed in Central Alberta were significantly less likely to be BCS for stage I (RR = 0.65; 95% 0.57, 0.72), II (RR = 0.58; 95% 0.49, 0.68), and III (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.95) disease, respectively, adjusting for patient age at diagnosis, clinical and treatment characteristics. No significant variation of post-BCS radiotherapy was found.
conclusionsFactors such as region of surgical treatment should not be related to the receipt of standard care within a publicly-funded health care system. Further investigation is needed to understand the significant geographic variation present within the province in order to identify appropriate interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.