Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609420›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Treatment variation in patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in Alberta from 2002 to 2010: a population-based study.

Stacey Fisher, He Gao, Yutaka Yasui, Kelly Dabbs, Marcy Winget

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in the Cost of Cancer Care: Beyond Drugs.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Survival in stage I-III breast cancer patients by surgical treatment in a publicly funded health care system.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Stacey FisherSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. slf1@ualberta.ca.
He GaoSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. hgao1@ualberta.ca.
Yutaka YasuiSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. yyasui@ualberta.ca.
Kelly DabbsDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. dabbs@shaw.ca.
Marcy WingetSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. mwinget@stanford.edu.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is generally the preferred treatment for women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of patients who receive BCS versus mastectomy and post-BCS radiotherapy, and explore factors associated with receipt of these treatments in Alberta, Canada.

methodsA retrospective population-based study was conducted that including all patients surgically treated with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed in Alberta from 2002-2010. Clinical characteristics, treatment information and patient age at diagnosis were collected from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Log binomial multiple regression was used to calculate stage-specific relative risk estimates of receiving BCS and post-BCS radiotherapy.

resultsOf the 14 646 patients included in the study, 44% received BCS, and of those, 88% received post-BCS radiotherapy. The adjusted relative risk of BCS was highest in Calgary and lowest in Central Alberta for all disease stages. Relative to surgeries performed in Calgary, those performed in Central Alberta were significantly less likely to be BCS for stage I (RR = 0.65; 95% 0.57, 0.72), II (RR = 0.58; 95% 0.49, 0.68), and III (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.95) disease, respectively, adjusting for patient age at diagnosis, clinical and treatment characteristics. No significant variation of post-BCS radiotherapy was found.

conclusionsFactors such as region of surgical treatment should not be related to the receipt of standard care within a publicly-funded health care system. Further investigation is needed to understand the significant geographic variation present within the province in order to identify appropriate interventions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCombined Modality TherapyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGeographyHumansMastectomy, RadicalMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID25609420
PMCPMC4308832
OpenAlexW2132510833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.