Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25609051›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2014

Imaging acute complications in cancer patients: what should be evaluated in the emergency setting?

Marcos D Guimaraes, Almir G V Bitencourt, Edson Marchiori, Rubens Chojniak, Jefferson L Gross, Vikas Kundra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The current state and future direction of childcare for cancer patients: a narrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcos D Guimaraes
Almir G V Bitencourt
Edson Marchiori
Rubens Chojniak
Jefferson L Gross
Vikas Kundra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased incidence world-wide of cancer and increased survival has also resulted in physicians seeing more complications in patients with cancer. In many cases, complications are the first manifestations of the disease. They may be insidious and develop over a period of months, or acute and manifest within minutes to days. Imaging examinations play an essential role in evaluating cancer and its complications. Plain radiography and ultrasonography (US) are generally performed initially in an urgent situation due to their wide availability, low cost, and minimal or no radiation exposure. However, depending on a patient's symptoms, evaluation with cross-sectional imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often necessary. In this review article, we discuss some of the most important acute noninfectious oncological complications for which imaging methods play an essential role in diagnosis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCardiac TamponadeEmergenciesHemorrhageHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntracranial HypertensionNeoplasmsPleural Effusion, MalignantPulmonary EmbolismSpinal Cord CompressionSuperior Vena Cava Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25609051
PMCPMC4331823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.