Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25608974›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

How rural and urban parents describe convenience in the context of school-based influenza vaccination: a qualitative study.

Candace Lind, Margaret L Russell, Ramona Collins, Judy MacDonald, Christine J Frank, Amy E Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Candace LindFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. cylind@ucalgary.ca.
Margaret L RussellDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. mlrussel@ucalgary.ca.
Ramona CollinsFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. ramonacollins@shaw.ca.
Judy MacDonaldAlberta Health Services & Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Judy.MacDonald@albertahealthservices.ca.
Christine J FrankFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. christinefrank@hotmail.com.
Amy E DavisUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. amy.davis121@gmail.com.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research PIR 124309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal influenza vaccine uptake among school-age children has been low, particularly among rural children, even in jurisdictions in Canada where this immunization is publicly funded. Providing this vaccination at school may be convenient for parents and might contribute to increased vaccine uptake, particularly among rural children. We explore the construct of convenience as an advantage of school based influenza vaccination. We also explore for rural urban differences in this construct.

methodsParticipants were parents of school-aged children from Alberta, Canada. We qualitatively analyzed focus group data from rural parents using a thematic template that emerged from prior work with urban parents. Both groups of parents had participated in focus groups to explore their perspectives on the acceptability of adding an annual influenza immunization to the immunization program that is currently delivered in Alberta schools. Data from within the theme of 'convenience' from both rural and urban parents were then further explored for sub-themes within convenience.

resultsData were obtained from nine rural and nine urban focus groups. The template of themes that had arisen from prior analysis of the urban data applied to the rural data. Convenience was a third level theme under Advantages. Five fourth level themes emerged from within convenience. Four of the five sub-themes were common to both rural and urban participants: reduction of parental burden to schedule, reduction in parental lost time, decrease in parental stress and increase in physical access points for influenza immunization. The fifth subtheme, increases temporal access to influenza immunization, emerged uniquely from the rural data.

conclusionsBoth rural and urban parents perceived that convenience would be an advantage of adding an annual influenza immunization to the vaccinations currently given to Alberta children at school. Improving temporal access to such immunization may be a more relevant aspect of convenience to rural than to urban parents.

Indexed as

ParentsRural PopulationSchoolsUrban PopulationAdolescentAdultAlbertaChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleQualitative ResearchInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25608974
PMCPMC4307148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.