Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25608916›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2014

The International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: evidentiary tables: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Peter Le Roux, David K Menon, Giuseppe Citerio, Paul Vespa, Mary Kay Bader, Gretchen Brophy, Michael N Diringer, Nino Stocchetti, Walter Videtta, Rocco Armonda and 25 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Routine intracranial pressure monitoring in acute coma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Advancements in Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Peter Le RouxBrain and Spine Center, Suite 370, Medical Science Building, Lankenau Medical Center, 100 East Lancaster Avenue, Wynnewood, PA, 19096, USA, lerouxp@mlhs.org.
David K Menon
Giuseppe Citerio
Paul Vespa
Mary Kay Bader
Gretchen Brophy
Michael N Diringer
Nino Stocchetti
Walter Videtta
Rocco Armonda
Neeraj Badjatia
Julian Bösel
Randall Chesnut
Sherry Chou
Jan Claassen
Marek Czosnyka
Michael De Georgia
Anthony Figaji
Jennifer Fugate
Raimund Helbok
David Horowitz
Peter Hutchinson
Monisha Kumar
Molly McNett
Chad Miller
Andrew Naidech
Mauro Oddo
DaiWai Olson
Kristine O'Phelan
J Javier Provencio
Corinna Puppo
Richard Riker
Claudia Roberson
Michael Schmidt
Fabio Taccone

Funding

Biomarkers of Vasospasm and Outcome following Subarachnoid HemorrhageK23NS073806 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHOU, SHERRY HSIANG-YI · 2011 to 2015
$940k
Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G0601025Medical Research Council G1002277Medical Research Council G9439390NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS073806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of technologies have been developed to assist decision-making during the management of patients with acute brain injury who require intensive care. A large body of research has been generated describing these various technologies. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC) organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to perform a systematic review of the published literature to help develop evidence-based practice recommendations on bedside physiologic monitoring. This supplement contains a Consensus Summary Statement with recommendations and individual topic reviews on physiologic processes important in the care of acute brain injury. In this article we provide the evidentiary tables for select topics including systemic hemodynamics, intracranial pressure, brain and systemic oxygenation, EEG, brain metabolism, biomarkers, processes of care and monitoring in emerging economies to provide the clinician ready access to evidence that supports recommendations about neuromonitoring.

Indexed as

Critical CareData CollectionEvidence-Based MedicineNeurophysiological MonitoringResearch DesignHumansInternationalitySocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID25608916
PMCPMC10596300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.