Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25608853›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Cross-amplification of Vicia sativa subsp. sativa microsatellites across 22 other Vicia species.

Sebastin Raveendar, Gi-An Lee, Young-Ah Jeon, Yun Jeong Lee, Jung-Ro Lee, Gyu-Taek Cho, Joon-Hyeong Cho, Jong-Hyun Park, Kyung-Ho Ma, Jong-Wook Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diversity of Naturalized Hairy Vetch (Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastin RaveendarNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Gi-An LeeNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Young-Ah JeonNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Yun Jeong LeeNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Jung-Ro LeeNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Gyu-Taek ChoNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Joon-Hyeong ChoDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, Seoul 100-175, Korea.
Jong-Hyun ParkFood Grain Policy Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong-si 339-012, Korea.
Kyung-Ho MaNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea.
Jong-Wook ChungNational Agrobiodiversity Centre, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 560-500, Korea. jwchung73@korea.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temperate and herbaceous genus Vicia L. is a member of the legume tribe Fabeae of the subfamily Papilionoideae. The genus Vicia comprises 166 annual or perennial species distributed mainly in Europe, Asia, and North America, but also extending to the temperate regions of South America and tropical Africa. The use of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for Vicia species has not been investigated as extensively as for other crop species. In this study, we assessed the potential for cross-species amplification of cDNA microsatellite markers developed from common vetch (Vicia sativa subsp. sativa). For cross-species amplification of the SSRs, amplification was carried out with genomic DNA isolated from two to eight accessions of 22 different Vicia species. For individual species or subspecies, the transferability rates ranged from 33% for V. ervilia to 82% for V. sativa subsp. nigra with an average rate of 52.0%. Because the rate of successful SSR marker amplification generally correlates with genetic distance, these SSR markers are potentially useful for analyzing genetic relationships between or within Vicia species.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPhylogenySpecies SpecificityViciaVicia sativaGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25608853
PMCPMC6272350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.