Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25608760›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Comparison of two methods to report potentially avoidable hospitalizations in France in 2012: a cross-sectional study.

Rodolphe Bourret, Grégoire Mercier, Jacques Mercier, Olivier Jonquet, Jean-Emmanuel De La Coussaye, Philippe J Bousquet, Jean-Marie Robine, Jean Bousquet

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Twenty-year trends of potentially avoidable hospitalizations for hypertension in Switzerland.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rodolphe BourretCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France. r-bourret@chu-montpellier.fr.
Grégoire MercierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France. g-mercier@chu-montpellier.fr.
Jacques MercierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France. jacques.mercier@univ-montp1.fr.
Olivier JonquetCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France. o-jonquet@chu-montpellier.fr.
Jean-Emmanuel De La CoussayeMACVIA-LR: Fighting Chronic Diseases for Active and Healthy Ageing (Reference Site of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing), Montpellier, France. jean.emmanuel.delacoussaye@chu-nimes.fr.
Philippe J BousquetMACVIA-LR: Fighting Chronic Diseases for Active and Healthy Ageing (Reference Site of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing), Montpellier, France. philippejean.bousquet@orange.fr.
Jean-Marie RobineMACVIA-LR: Fighting Chronic Diseases for Active and Healthy Ageing (Reference Site of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing), Montpellier, France. robinejm@gmail.com.
Jean BousquetCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France. jean.bousquet@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPotentially avoidable hospitalizations represent an indirect measure of access to effective primary care. However many approaches have been proposed to measure them and results may differ considerably. This work aimed at examining the agreement between the Weissman and Ansari approaches in order to measure potentially avoidable hospitalizations in France.

methodsBased on the 2012 French national hospital discharge database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information), potentially avoidable hospitalizations were measured using two approaches proposed by Weissman et al. and by Ansari et al. Age- and sex-standardised rates were calculated in each department. The two approaches were compared for diagnosis groups, type of stay, severity, age, sex, and length of stay.

resultsThe number and age-standardised rate of potentially avoidable hospitalizations estimated by the Weissman et al. and Ansari et al. approaches were 742,474 (13.3 cases per 1,000 inhabitants) and 510,206 (9.0 cases per 1,000 inhabitants), respectively. There are significant differences by conditions groups, age, length of stay, severity level, and proportion of medical stays between the Weissman and Ansari methods.

conclusionsRegarding potentially avoidable hospitalizations in France in 2012, the agreement between the Weissman and Ansari approaches is poor. The method used to measure potentially avoidable hospitalizations is critical, and might influence the assessment of accessibility and performance of primary care.

Indexed as

Medical FutilityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLength of Stay

Identifiers

PMID25608760
PMCPMC4316643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.