ReviewDer Anaesthesist2015
[Acute treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-hospital endotracheal intubation in severe traumatic brain injury: ventilation targets and mortality-a retrospective analysis of 308 patients.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- [On the quality of the external post-mortem examination in cases of fatal head trauma : A comparison of death certificate and forensic autopsy].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
- [Drugs for intravenous induction of anesthesia: ketamine, midazolam and synopsis of current hypnotics].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- [Severe traumatic head injury].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and permanent disability and a common and important global problem. The contribution of secondary posttraumatic brain damage to overall disability in TBI is significant, underlining the importance of prompt and comprehensive treatment for affected patients.
methodsThis article focuses on current concepts of prehospital and emergency room management of patients with severe TBI to prevent secondary brain injuries. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Preclinical prevention and treatment of hypoxia, hypotension and hypercarbia are essential, as they affect the long-term outcome in TBI patients. Prehospital intubation should be critically weighed and in the context of an individual decision. In general, prehospital intubation is more difficult than in the clinical setting. The combination of ketamine and benzodiazepines are commonly used to induce anesthesia before intubation in hemodynamic instable patients. The choice of a muscle relaxant for anesthesia induction is either a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent or succinylcholine. Administration of mannitol or hypertonic saline is effective to rapidly decrease intracranial pressure. Whenever possible the final destination for transport of TBI patients should be a level I center with round the clock neurosurgical expertise. Trauma-induced coagulopathy should be recognized and immediately treated using a point-of-care testing.
conclusionHypoxia, hypotension and hypercarbia should strictly be avoided to improve survival and neurological outcome in patients with severe TBI. The prehospital decision to intubate must be made on a case by case basis at the accident site. A level I trauma center should be the destination for this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.