Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25607944›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2015

Phytomonas: trypanosomatids adapted to plant environments.

Eleanor Jaskowska, Claire Butler, Gail Preston, Steven Kelly

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Enhanced Expression of Cruzipain-Like Molecules in the PhytoflagellateFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Novel Genotype and First Record ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor JaskowskaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Claire ButlerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gail PrestonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Steven KellyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F016093/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 100 years after trypanosomatids were first discovered in plant tissues, Phytomonas parasites have now been isolated across the globe from members of 24 different plant families. Most identified species have not been associated with any plant pathology and to date only two species are definitively known to cause plant disease. These diseases (wilt of palm and coffee phloem necrosis) are problematic in areas of South America where they threaten the economies of developing countries. In contrast to their mammalian infective relatives, our knowledge of the biology of Phytomonas parasites and how they interact with their plant hosts is limited. This review draws together a century of research into plant trypanosomatids, from the first isolations and experimental infections to the recent publication of the first Phytomonas genomes. The availability of genomic data for these plant parasites opens a new avenue for comparative investigations into trypanosomatid biology and provides fresh insight into how this important group of parasites have adapted to survive in a spectrum of hosts from crocodiles to coconuts.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalEcosystemAnimalsEndophytesEuphorbiaHost SpecificityHumansPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlantsTrypanosomatina

Identifiers

PMID25607944
PMCPMC4301809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.