Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25607768›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2016

Immediate Implant Reconstruction Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Lymphedema Compared to Mastectomy Alone: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Cynthia L Miller, Amy S Colwell, Nora Horick, Melissa N Skolny, Lauren S Jammallo, Jean A O'Toole, Mina N Shenouda, Betro T Sadek, Meyha N Swaroop, Chantal M Ferguson and 3 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Advances in intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of limb lymphedema].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. [Research progress of combined surgical treatment of lymphedema based on vascularized lymph node transfer].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Risk Factors, Screening, Management, and the Impact of Locoregional Treatment.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. The legacy of lymphedema: Impact on nursing practice and vascular access.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia L Miller*Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA †Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA ‡Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA §Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA ¶Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Amy S Colwell
Nora Horick
Melissa N Skolny
Lauren S Jammallo
Jean A O'Toole
Mina N Shenouda
Betro T Sadek
Meyha N Swaroop
Chantal M Ferguson
Barbara L Smith
Michelle C Specht
Alphonse G Taghian
Office of the Director · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Variation in Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Breast Cancer RiskP50CA089393 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS, LYNDSAY NORINE · 2000 to 2009
$28.8M
Early Detection and Treatment of Lymphedema in Women with Breast CancerR01CA139118 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TAGHIAN, ALPHONSE G · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA089393NCI NIH HHS P50CA089393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139118NCI NIH HHS R01CA139118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to determine the risk of lymphedema associated with immediate breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone.

backgroundImmediate breast reconstruction is increasingly performed at the time of mastectomy. Few studies have examined whether breast reconstruction impacts development of lymphedema.

methodsA total of 616 patients with breast cancer who underwent 891 mastectomies between 2005 and 2013 were prospectively screened for lymphedema at our institution, with 22.2 months' median follow-up. Mastectomies were categorized as immediate implant, immediate autologous, or no reconstruction. Arm measurements were performed preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up using a Perometer. Lymphedema was defined as 10% or more arm volume increase compared to preoperative. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine lymphedema rates and risk factors.

resultsOf 891 mastectomies, 65% (580/891) had immediate implant, 11% (101/891) immediate autologous, and 24% (210/891) no reconstruction. The two-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was as follows: 4.08% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.59-6.41%] implant, 9.89% (95% CI: 4.98-19.1%) autologous, and 26.7% (95% CI: 20.4-34.4%) no reconstruction. By multivariate analysis, immediate implant [hazards ratio (HR): 0.352, P < 0.0001] but not autologous (HR: 0.706, P = 0.2151) reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphedema compared to no reconstruction. Axillary lymph node dissection (P < 0.0001), higher body mass index (P < 0.0001), and greater number of nodes dissected (P = 0.0324) were associated with increased lymphedema risk.

conclusionsThis prospective study suggests that in patients for whom implant-based reconstruction is available, immediate implant reconstruction does not increase the risk of lymphedema compared to mastectomy alone.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationMastectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphedemaMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25607768
PMCPMC4508247
OpenAlexW2048627042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.