Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25607261›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Intensive care unit visitation policies in Brazil: a multicenter survey.

Fernando José da Silva Ramos, Renata Rego Lins Fumis, Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo, Guilherme Schettino

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernando José da Silva RamosLaboratório de Pesquisa em Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Renata Rego Lins FumisLaboratório de Pesquisa em Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Luciano Cesar Pontes de AzevedoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Guilherme SchettinoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to determine which visitation policy was the most predominant in Brazilian intensive care units and what amenities were provided to visitors.

methodsEight hundred invitations were sent to the e-mail addresses of intensivist physicians and nurses who were listed in the research groups of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Network and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network. The e-mail contained a link to a 33-item questionnaire about the profile of their intensive care unit.

resultsOne hundred sixty-two questionnaires from intensive care units located in all regions of the country, but predominantly in the Southeast and South (58% and 16%), were included in the study. Only 2.6% of the intensive care units reported having liberal visitation policies, while 45.1% of the intensive care units allowed 2 visitation periods and 69.1% allowed 31-60 minutes of visitation per period. In special situations, such as end-of-life cases, 98.7% of them allowed flexible visitation. About half of them (50.8%) did not offer any bedside amenities for visitors. Only 46.9% of the intensive care units had a family meeting room, and 37% did not have a waiting room.

conclusionRestrictive visitation policies are predominant in Brazilian intensive care units, with most of them allowing just two periods of visitation per day. There is also a lack of amenities for visitors.

Indexed as

Organizational PolicyBrazilHumansIntensive Care UnitsSurveys and QuestionnairesVisitors to Patients

Identifiers

PMID25607261
PMCPMC4304460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.