Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25606588›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2014

New concepts in breast cancer genomics and genetics.

Rodrigo Goncalves, Wayne A Warner, Jingqin Luo, Matthew J Ellis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harnessing the Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. TP53 Mutations in Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Targeting the undruggable: immunotherapy meets personalized oncology in the genomic era.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodrigo GoncalvesBreast Cancer Program, Department of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St Louis 63110, MO, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St Louis 63110, MO, USA; Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, 320A Cullen MS600, Houston 77030, TX, USA.
Wayne A Warner
Jingqin Luo
Matthew J Ellis
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Cancer Proteome Center at Washington Univ, Univ of North Carolina & Boise StateU24CA160035 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, XIAN, ELLIS, MATTHEW J · 2011 to 2016
$11.8M
NOVEL BIOMARKERS FOR AROMATASE INHIBITOR THERAPYR01CA095614 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELLIS, MATTHEW J, LUO, JINGQIN · 2003 to 2013
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P30CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095614NCI NIH HHS U24 CA160035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing approaches have generated data on thousands of breast cancer genomes. In this review, we consider progress largely from the perspective of new concepts and hypotheses raised so far. These include challenges to the multistep model of breast carcinogenesis and the discovery of new defects in DNA repair through sequence analysis. Issues for functional genomics include the development of strategies to differentiate between mutations that are likely to drive carcinogenesis and bystander background mutations, as well as the importance of mechanistic studies that examine the role of mutations in genes with roles in splicing, histone methylation, and long non-coding RNA function. The application of genome-annotated patient-derived breast cancer xenografts as a potentially more reliable preclinical model is also discussed. Finally, we address the challenge of extracting medical value from genomic data. A weakness of many datasets is inadequate clinical annotation, which hampers the establishment of links between the mutation spectra and the efficacy of drugs or disease phenotypes. Tools such as dGene and the DGIdb are being developed to identify possible druggable mutations, but these programs are a work in progress since extensive molecular pharmacology is required to develop successful ‘genome-forward’ clinical trials. Examples are emerging, however, including targeting HER2 in HER2 mutant breast cancer and mutant ESR1 in ESR1 endocrine refractory luminal-type breast cancer. Finally, the integration of DNA- and RNA-based sequencing studies with mass spectrometry-based peptide sequencing and an unbiased determination of post-translational modifications promises a more complete view of the biochemistry of breast cancer cells and points toward a new discovery horizon in our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25606588
PMCPMC4384360
OpenAlexW2156140763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.