ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2014
New concepts in breast cancer genomics and genetics.
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing the Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Transcriptomic era of cancers in females: new epigenetic perspectives and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The uncharted role of HER2 mutant alleles in breast cancer.Oncotarget · 2023Article
- Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Poziotinib Inhibits HER2-Mutant-Driven Therapeutic Resistance and Multiorgan Metastasis in Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Overview of current microRNA biomarker signatures as potential diagnostic tools for leukaemic conditions.Non-coding RNA research · 2020Review
- Frequent amplifications of ESR1, ERBB2 and MDM4 in primary invasive lobular breast carcinoma.Cancer letters · 2019Article
- CHD1L promotes cell cycle progression and cell motility by up-regulating MDM2 in breast cancer.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
- RET in breast cancer: pathogenic implications and mechanisms of drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019Review
- Article
- Centrosome amplification: a suspect in breast cancer and racial disparities.Endocrine-related cancer · 2017Review
- DNA Methylation in Breast Tumor from High-risk Women in the Breast Cancer Family Registry.Anticancer research · 2017Article
- TP53 Mutations in Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017Review
- Genetic and epigenetic factors affect RET gene expression in breast cancer cell lines and influence survival in patients.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Changing molecular profile of brain metastases compared with matched breast primary cancers and impact on clinical outcomes.British journal of cancer · 2016Article
- Current Management Strategies in Breast Cancer by Targeting Key Altered Molecular Players.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Review
- Targeting the undruggable: immunotherapy meets personalized oncology in the genomic era.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing approaches have generated data on thousands of breast cancer genomes. In this review, we consider progress largely from the perspective of new concepts and hypotheses raised so far. These include challenges to the multistep model of breast carcinogenesis and the discovery of new defects in DNA repair through sequence analysis. Issues for functional genomics include the development of strategies to differentiate between mutations that are likely to drive carcinogenesis and bystander background mutations, as well as the importance of mechanistic studies that examine the role of mutations in genes with roles in splicing, histone methylation, and long non-coding RNA function. The application of genome-annotated patient-derived breast cancer xenografts as a potentially more reliable preclinical model is also discussed. Finally, we address the challenge of extracting medical value from genomic data. A weakness of many datasets is inadequate clinical annotation, which hampers the establishment of links between the mutation spectra and the efficacy of drugs or disease phenotypes. Tools such as dGene and the DGIdb are being developed to identify possible druggable mutations, but these programs are a work in progress since extensive molecular pharmacology is required to develop successful ‘genome-forward’ clinical trials. Examples are emerging, however, including targeting HER2 in HER2 mutant breast cancer and mutant ESR1 in ESR1 endocrine refractory luminal-type breast cancer. Finally, the integration of DNA- and RNA-based sequencing studies with mass spectrometry-based peptide sequencing and an unbiased determination of post-translational modifications promises a more complete view of the biochemistry of breast cancer cells and points toward a new discovery horizon in our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.