Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25606335›Full record

ArticleJournal of lasers in medical sciences2014

The disinfecting efficacy of root canals with laser photodynamic therapy.

Aliu Xhevdet, David Stubljar, Igor Kriznar, Tomislav Jukic, Miha Skvarc, Peter Veranic, Alojz Ihan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lasers in medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effectiveness of Different Final Irrigation Procedures onMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In vivo model for microbial invasion of tooth root dentinal tubules.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aliu XhevdetFaculty of Medicine Prishtina, Kosovo.
David StubljarInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Zaloska 4, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Igor KriznarDepartment for Dental Diseases and Morphology of Dental Organ, Medical Faculty, Vrazov Trg 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomislav JukicMedical Faculty of Osijek, Josipa Hutlera 4, Osijek, Croatia.
Miha SkvarcInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Zaloska 4, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Peter VeranicInstitute of Cell Biology, Lipiceva Ulica 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Alojz IhanInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Zaloska 4, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Prishtina · XK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfecting microorganisms of the root canals are difficult to eliminate during endodontic treatment. In this study the effect of root canal disinfection with photodynamic therapy (PDT) at different time intervals in comparison to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in extracted teeth colonized with Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans was tested to assess which treatment reaches the best disinfection rate.

methodsOne hundred and fifty-six extracted single-rooted teeth were collected, sterilized, and incubated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) and Candida albicans (ATCC 60193). The two groups were further divided into 6 groups depending on the treatment mode; HELBO(®)Endo Blue photosensitizer dye application followed by HELBO laser irradiation, with the output power 100 mW and emission of 660 nm, for a 1, 3 and 5 minutes, irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl, 10 second PUI with 2.5% NaOCl and control group. Flow cytometry and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis were used to determine the effectiveness of the different disinfecting methods.

resultsThe different disinfecting methods had a significantly different effect on the percent of dead cells (p<0.001). A statistical significance of dead cells between organisms (p<0.001) was observed. Interaction between the disinfecting method and both of organisms had shown the statistical significance (p=0.045). Percent of dead cells in treatment groups were significantly higher compared to control group for both organisms (p<0.001).

conclusionsPUI still remains the most effective method for disinfection of infected root canals in endodontics compared to hand instrumentation for both microorganisms. SEM analysis only confirmed the results. Other results ex vivo suggested that prolonging the time from 1 to 5 minutes of PDT increased the number of killed microorganisms significantly, therefore longer times of photodynamic therapy were recommended. Irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl showed similar results to 5 min irradiation.

Indexed as

Candida albicansenterococcus faecalisinfectionroot canal

Identifiers

PMID25606335
PMCPMC4290519
OpenAlexW2140521174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.