Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25606055›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2014

Single gene microdeletions and microduplication of 3p26.3 in three unrelated families: CNTN6 as a new candidate gene for intellectual disability.

Anna A Kashevarova, Lyudmila P Nazarenko, Soren Schultz-Pedersen, Nikolay A Skryabin, Olga A Salyukova, Nataliya N Chechetkina, Ekaterina N Tolmacheva, Aleksey A Rudko, Pamela Magini, Claudio Graziano and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna A KashevarovaLaboratory of Cytogenetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, 10 Nab. Ushaiki, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Lyudmila P NazarenkoLaboratory of Hereditary Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk, Russia ; Department of Medical Genetics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia.
Soren Schultz-PedersenPrivate Pediatric Clinics "Bornelaegen Aarhus", Aarhus, Denmark.
Nikolay A SkryabinLaboratory of Cytogenetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, 10 Nab. Ushaiki, 634050 Tomsk, Russia ; Laboratory of Human Ontogenetics, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
Olga A SalyukovaLaboratory of Hereditary Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk, Russia ; Department of Medical Genetics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia.
Nataliya N ChechetkinaLaboratory of Hereditary Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk, Russia.
Ekaterina N TolmachevaLaboratory of Cytogenetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, 10 Nab. Ushaiki, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Aleksey A RudkoGenetic Clinic, Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk, Russia.
Pamela MaginiUnit of Medical Genetics, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio GrazianoUnit of Medical Genetics, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni RomeoUnit of Medical Genetics, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Shelagh JossDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Level 2, Laboratory Medicine Building, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF Scotland UK.
Zeynep TümerApplied Human Molecular Genetics, Kennedy Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Denmark.
Igor N LebedevLaboratory of Cytogenetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, 10 Nab. Ushaiki, 634050 Tomsk, Russia ; Department of Medical Genetics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia.
Research Institute of Medical Genetics of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUUniversity of Bologna · ITKennedy Center · DKSiberian State Medical University · RUSouthern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of submicroscopic chromosomal alterations in patients with a idiopathic intellectual disability (ID) allows significant improvement in delineation of the regions of the genome that are associated with brain development and function. However, these chromosomal regions usually contain several protein-coding genes and regulatory elements, complicating the understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations. We report two siblings with ID and an unrelated patient with atypical autism who had 3p26.3 microdeletions and one intellectually disabled patient with a 3p26.3 microduplication encompassing only the CNTN6 gene.

resultsTwo 295.1-kb microdeletions and one 766.1-kb microduplication of 3p26.3 involving a single gene, CNTN6, were identified with an Agilent 60K array. Another 271.9-kb microdeletion of 3p26.3 was detected using an Affymetrix CytoScan HD chromosome microarray platform. The CHL1 and CNTN4 genes, although adjacent to the CNTN6 gene, were not affected in either of these patients.

conclusionsThe protein encoded by CNTN6 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and functions as a cell adhesion molecule that is involved in the formation of axon connections in the developing nervous system. Our results indicate that CNTN6 may be a candidate gene for ID.

Indexed as

3p26.3 microdeletion3p26.3 microduplicationCNTN6Intellectual disabilityReciprocal microdeletions/microduplications

Identifiers

PMID25606055
PMCPMC4299808
OpenAlexW2009395130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.