Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25605923›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Belief about nicotine selectively modulates value and reward prediction error signals in smokers.

Xiaosi Gu, Terry Lohrenz, Ramiro Salas, Philip R Baldwin, Alireza Soltani, Ulrich Kirk, Paul M Cinciripini, P Read Montague

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Effects of Smoking Status and State on Intrinsic Connectivity.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Research on Behavioral Discrimination of Nicotine May Inform FDA Policy on Setting a Maximum Nicotine Content in Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaosi GuWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; Human Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24011;
Terry LohrenzHuman Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24011;
Ramiro SalasMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77225;
Philip R BaldwinMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77225;
Alireza SoltaniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755;
Ulrich KirkDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark;
Paul M CinciripiniDepartments of Behavioral Science, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230; and.
P Read MontagueWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; Human Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24011; Department of Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 read@vtc.vt.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · USVirginia Tech · USDartmouth College · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL SUBSTRATES OF ADDICTION AND REWARDR01DA011723 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI MONTAGUE, P READ · 1998 to 2013
$3.6M
Neural Economics of Biological Substrates of ValuationR01MH085496 · NIMH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI MONTAGUE, P READ · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
The biological and behavioral bases of decision-making in medical professionalsRC4AG039067 · NIA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI MONTAGUE, P READ · 2010 to 2010
$1.0M
Role of Habenula in Tobacco AddictionK01DA026539 · NIDA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SALAS, RAMIRO · 2010 to 2013
$516k
Functional Imaging of the Habenula in Tobacco SmokersR03DA029167 · NIDA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SALAS, RAMIRO · 2011 to 2011
$230k
NIA NIH HHS RC4 AG039067NIDA NIH HHS DA026539NIDA NIH HHS DA029167NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA026539NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011723NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA029167NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085496Wellcome Trust 091188Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how prior beliefs impact biophysically described processes in the presence of neuroactive drugs, which presents a profound challenge to the understanding of the mechanisms and treatments of addiction. We engineered smokers' prior beliefs about the presence of nicotine in a cigarette smoked before a functional magnetic resonance imaging session where subjects carried out a sequential choice task. Using a model-based approach, we show that smokers' beliefs about nicotine specifically modulated learning signals (value and reward prediction error) defined by a computational model of mesolimbic dopamine systems. Belief of "no nicotine in cigarette" (compared with "nicotine in cigarette") strongly diminished neural responses in the striatum to value and reward prediction errors and reduced the impact of both on smokers' choices. These effects of belief could not be explained by global changes in visual attention and were specific to value and reward prediction errors. Thus, by modulating the expression of computationally explicit signals important for valuation and choice, beliefs can override the physical presence of a potent neuroactive compound like nicotine. These selective effects of belief demonstrate that belief can modulate model-based parameters important for learning. The implications of these findings may be far ranging because belief-dependent effects on learning signals could impact a host of other behaviors in addiction as well as in other mental health problems.

Indexed as

CultureRewardAdultAttentionChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronsNicotinePlacebosSmokingVisual PerceptionNicotinePlacebosbeliefdopaminefMRInicotine addictionreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID25605923
PMCPMC4345562
OpenAlexW1975059457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.