A tablet that shifts the clock.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Sleep and workload mediate the relationship between digital engagement and burnout: a national cross-sectional study of university faculty in India.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
   Article
2. The use of entertainment and communication technologies before sleep could affect sleep and weight status: a population-based study among children.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Evening use of light-emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next-morning alertness.2015

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as