Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25605891›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Population dynamics of islet-infiltrating cells in autoimmune diabetes.

Angela M Magnuson, Greg M Thurber, Rainer H Kohler, Ralph Weissleder, Diane Mathis, Christophe Benoist

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advancing Animal Models of Human Type 1 Diabetes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M MagnusonDivision of Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
Greg M ThurberCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; and.
Rainer H KohlerCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; and.
Ralph WeisslederCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; and.
Diane MathisDivision of Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Christophe BenoistDivision of Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115 cbdm@hms.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Visualzing Lymphocyte Attack on Pancreas B CellsP01AI054904 · NIAID · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI JACKSON, RICHARD · 2003 to 2013
$16.0M
Naive T cell homeostasis: Treg selection and survivalR37AI051530 · NIAID · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BENOIST, CHRISTOPHE O. · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Naive T cell survival: TCR and IL-7R signal interplayR01AI051530 · NIAID · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI BENOIST, CHRISTOPHE O. · 2002 to 2009
$2.4M
Whole Body Imaging of Beta Cell Mass in DiabetesK01DK093766 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THURBER, GREG · 2011 to 2014
$641k
NIAID NIH HHS AI051530NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI054904NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051530NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI051530NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK093766NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK093766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type-1 diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse starts with an insulitis stage, wherein a mixed population of leukocytes invades the pancreas, followed by overt diabetes once enough insulin-producing β-cells are destroyed by invading immunocytes. Little is known of the dynamics of lymphocyte movement into the pancreas during disease progression. We used the Kaede transgenic mouse, whose photoconvertible fluorescent reporter permits noninvasive labeling and subsequent tracking of immunocytes, to investigate pancreatic infiltrate dynamics and the requirement for antigen specificity during progression of autoimmune diabetes in the unmanipulated NOD mouse. Our results indicate that the insulitic lesion is very open with constant cell influx and active turnover, predominantly of B and T lymphocytes, but also CD11b(+)c(+) myeloid cells. Both naïve- and memory-phenotype lymphocytes trafficked to the insulitis, but Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells circulated less than their conventional CD4(+) counterparts. Receptor specificity for pancreatic antigens seemed irrelevant for this homing, because similar kinetics were observed in polyclonal and antigen-specific transgenic contexts. This "open" configuration was also observed after reversal of overt diabetes by anti-CD3 treatment. These results portray insulitis as a dynamic lesion at all stages of disease, continuously fed by a mixed influx of immunocytes, and thus susceptible to evolve over time in response to immunologic or environmental influences.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmune DiseasesB-LymphocytesDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDisease ProgressionImmunologic MemoryIslets of LangerhansMiceMice, Inbred NODT-Lymphocytescell tracerreporterTreg

Identifiers

PMID25605891
PMCPMC4321317
OpenAlexW2026150536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.