Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25605887›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction.

Tina Strombach, Bernd Weber, Zsofia Hangebrauk, Peter Kenning, Iliana I Karipidis, Philippe N Tobler, Tobias Kalenscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Steeper social discounting after human basolateral amygdala damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tipping the balance between fairness and efficiency through temporoparietal stimulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tina StrombachComparative Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany; Center for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; tina.strombach@hhu.de.
Bernd WeberDepartment of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany; Center for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
Zsofia HangebraukComparative Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
Peter KenningDepartment of Corporate Management and Economics, Zeppelin University, 88045 Friedrichshafen, Germany; Chair of Marketing, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; and.
Iliana I KaripidisLaboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research, Department of Economics, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland.
Philippe N ToblerLaboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research, Department of Economics, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland.
Tobias KalenscherComparative Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most people are generous, but not toward everyone alike: generosity usually declines with social distance between individuals, a phenomenon called social discounting. Despite the pervasiveness of social discounting, social distance between actors has been surprisingly neglected in economic theory and neuroscientific research. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the neural basis of this process to understand the neural underpinnings of social decision making. Participants chose between selfish and generous alternatives, yielding either a large reward for the participant alone, or smaller rewards for the participant and another individual at a particular social distance. We found that generous choices engaged the temporoparietal junction (TPJ). In particular, the TPJ activity was scaled to the social-distance-dependent conflict between selfish and generous motives during prosocial choice, consistent with ideas that the TPJ promotes generosity by facilitating overcoming egoism bias. Based on functional coupling data, we propose and provide evidence for a biologically plausible neural model according to which the TPJ supports social discounting by modulating basic neural value signals in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to incorporate social-distance-dependent other-regarding preferences into an otherwise exclusively own-reward value representation.

Indexed as

AdultBehaviorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobeTemporal LobeconnectivityfMRIneuroeconomicsprosocial choicesocial discounting

Identifiers

PMID25605887
PMCPMC4321268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.