ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Impact of intravascular ultrasound findings on long-term patency after self-expanding nitinol stent implantation in the iliac artery lesion.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-year clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via transradial intervention for aorto-iliac arterial disease.Heart and vessels · 2025Observational
- Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Review
- Thrombotic Lesions are Associated with Poor Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Non-Acute Aortoiliac Total Occlusions.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2021Observational
- The distribution of calcified nodule and plaque rupture in patients with peripheral artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound analysis.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of stent patency for the coronary artery lesion have been established, little is known about IVUS predictors of stent patency for the aorto-iliac artery lesion. We analyzed 154 lesions of 122 patients who underwent stent implantation for iliac artery lesions. Quantitative and qualitative IVUS analyses were performed for pre- and post-procedural IVUS imaging in all lesions. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was defined as clinically driven revascularization with >50 % angiographic stenosis of the target lesion. The mean follow-up period was 39 ± 16 months. TLRs were performed in 13 lesions (8.4 %). Post-procedural minimum stent area (MSA) was significantly smaller in the TLR group compared to the no-TLR group (16.0 ± 5.8 vs. 25.6 ± 8.5 mm(2), p < 0.001). Stent edge dissection was frequently observed in the TLR group compared to the no-TLR group (53.8 vs. 24.1 %, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that post-procedural MSA (OR = 0.76, p < 0.01) and stent edge dissection (OR = 10.4, p < 0.01) were independent IVUS predictors of TLR. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis identified post-procedural MSA <17.8 mm(2) as the optimal cut-point for the prediction of TLR (AUC = 0.846). Post-procedural MSA and stent edge dissection could predict long-term stent patency in the iliac artery lesion. Our results propose that adequate stent enlargement without edge dissection might be important to reduce TLR in the iliac artery lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.