Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25605626›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2015

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of large hemispheric infarction : a statement for health care professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the German Society for Neuro-intensive Care and Emergency Medicine.

Michel T Torbey, Julian Bösel, Denise H Rhoney, Fred Rincon, Dimitre Staykov, Arun P Amar, Panayiotis N Varelas, Eric Jüttler, DaiWai Olson, Hagen B Huttner and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and synthesis of global stroke guidelines on behalf of the World Stroke Organization.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Michel T TorbeyCerebrovascular and Neurocritical Care Division, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Comprehensive Stroke Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, 7th Floor, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA, michel.torbey@osumc.edu.
Julian Bösel
Denise H Rhoney
Fred Rincon
Dimitre Staykov
Arun P Amar
Panayiotis N Varelas
Eric Jüttler
DaiWai Olson
Hagen B Huttner
Klaus Zweckberger
Kevin N Sheth
Christian Dohmen
Ansgar M Brambrink
Stephan A Mayer
Osama O Zaidat
Werner Hacke
Stefan Schwab
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEHenry Ford Health System · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USOregon Health & Science University · USOstalb-Klinikum Aalen · DESouthern California University for Professional Studies · USSouthwestern University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Cologne · DEYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large hemispheric infarction (LHI), also known as malignant middle cerebral infarction, is a devastating disease associated with significant disability and mortality. Clinicians and family members are often faced with a paucity of high quality clinical data as they attempt to determine the most appropriate course of treatment for patients with LHI, and current stroke guidelines do not provide a detailed approach regarding the day-to-day management of these complicated patients. To address this need, the Neurocritical Care Society organized an international multidisciplinary consensus conference on the critical care management of LHI. Experts from neurocritical care, neurosurgery, neurology, interventional neuroradiology, and neuroanesthesiology from Europe and North America were recruited based on their publications and expertise. The panel devised a series of clinical questions related to LHI, and assessed the quality of data related to these questions using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation guideline system. They then developed recommendations (denoted as strong or weak) based on the quality of the evidence, as well as the balance of benefits and harms of the studied interventions, the values and preferences of patients, and resource considerations.

Indexed as

ConsensusCritical CareEmergency MedicineEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryNeurologyPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID25605626
OpenAlexW1584937899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.