Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604997›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Colonization of malaria vectors under semi-field conditions as a strategy for maintaining genetic and phenotypic similarity with wild populations.

Kija R Ng'habi, Yoosook Lee, Bart G J Knols, Dickson Mwasheshi, Gregory C Lanzaro, Heather M Ferguson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kija R Ng'habiIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara, Kilombero, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania. kija@ihi.or.tz.
Yoosook LeeVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calfornia, Davis, USA. yoslee@ucdavis.edu.
Bart G J KnolsIn2Care BV, Costerweg 5, 6702 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. bart@in2care.org.
Dickson MwasheshiIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara, Kilombero, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania. dmwasheshi@ihi.or.tz.
Gregory C LanzaroVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calfornia, Davis, USA. gclanzaro@ucdavis.edu.
Heather M FergusonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. Heather.Ferguson@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D020042/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 091030/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria still accounts for an estimated 207 million cases and 627,000 deaths worldwide each year. One proposed approach to complement existing malaria control methods is the release of genetically-modified (GM) and/or sterile male mosquitoes. As opposed to laboratory colonization, this requires realistic semi field systems to produce males that can compete for females in nature. This study investigated whether the establishment of a colony of the vector Anopheles arabiensis under more natural semi-field conditions can maintain higher levels of genetic diversity than achieved by laboratory colonization using traditional methods.

methodsWild females of the African malaria vector An. arabiensis were collected from a village in southern Tanzania and used to establish new colonies under different conditions at the Ifakara Health Institute. Levels of genetic diversity and inbreeding were monitored in colonies of An. arabiensis that were simultaneously established in small cage colonies in the SFS and in a large semi-field (SFS) cage and compared with that observed in the original founder population. Phenotypic traits that determine their fitness (body size and energetic reserves) were measured at 10(th) generation and compared to founder wild population.

resultsIn contrast to small cage colonies, the SFS population of An. arabiensis exhibited a higher degree of similarity to the founding field population through time in several ways: (i) the SFS colony maintained a significantly higher level of genetic variation than small cage colonies, (ii) the SFS colony had a lower degree of inbreeding than small cage colonies, and (iii) the mean and range of mosquito body size in the SFS colony was closer to that of the founding wild population than that of small cage colonies. Small cage colonies had significantly lower lipids and higher glycogen abundances than SFS and wild population.

conclusionsColonization of An. arabiensis under semi-field conditions was associated with the retention of a higher degree of genetic diversity, reduced inbreeding and greater phenotypic similarity to the founding wild population than observed in small cage colonies. Thus, mosquitoes from such semi-field populations are expected to provide more realistic representation of mosquito ecology and physiology than those from small cage colonies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAnophelesEcosystemFemaleGenotypeInbreedingMaleMosquito ControlPhenotypeTanzania

Identifiers

PMID25604997
PMCPMC4340333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.