Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604621›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2015

Impact of hybrid procedure on P wave duration for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Narendra Kumar, Pietro Bonizzi, Laurent Pison, Kevin Phan, Theo Lankveld, Bart Maesen, Bart Maessen, Mark La Meir, Sandro Gelsomino, Jos Maessen and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing Atrial Fibrillation Substrates by P Wave Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Narendra KumarDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands, drnarendra007kr@gmail.com.
Pietro Bonizzi
Laurent Pison
Kevin Phan
Theo Lankveld
Bart Maesen
Bart Maessen
Mark La Meir
Sandro Gelsomino
Jos Maessen
Harry Crijns
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITMaastricht University · NLThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimHybrid procedure (HP) involves epicardial isolation of pulmonary vein and posterior wall of left atrium, and endocardial checking of lesions and touchups (if needed). We aimed at observing the effect of hybrid procedure on P wave duration (PWD), calculated automatically from surface ECG leads at start and end of HP, and also for relationship to atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence at 9 months.

methodsForty-one patients (32 male; mean age, 58.4 ± 9.5 years) underwent HP, as first ever ablation. A new automated method was used for P wave segmentation and PWD estimation from recognizable P waves in ECG lead I or II before and after HP, based on fitting of each P wave by means of two Gaussian functions.

resultsOverall, PWD was significantly decreased after procedure (104.4 ± 25.1 ms vs. 84.7 ± 23.8 ms, p = 0.0151), especially in persistent AF patients (122.4 ± 32.2 ms vs. 85.6 ± 24.5 ms, p = 0.02). PWD preprocedure was significantly higher in persistent than in paroxysmal patients (122.4 ± 32.2 ms vs. 92.5 ± 17.9 ms, p = 0.0383). PWD was significantly decreased after procedure in prior electrical cardioverted patients (106.7 ± 30.5 ms vs. 84.7 ± 23.1 ms, p = 0.0353). After 9-month follow-up of 40 patients, HP-induced PWD decrease was significant for the 12 persistent patients without recurrence (122.4.1 ± 35.3 ms vs. 85.6 ± 22.0 ms, p = 0.0210).

conclusionPreprocedure PWD was higher for persistent than paroxysmal patients. HP reduced PWD significantly. Nine-month follow-up suggests that HP is successful in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm. To individualize AF therapy, AF type-based selection of patients may be possible before procedure. Automated analysis of PWD from surface ECG is possible.

Indexed as

AgedAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationCohort StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePulmonary VeinsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSex FactorsStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID25604621
OpenAlexW2027426459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.