Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604595›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2015

Escalation of oncologic services at the end of life among patients with gynecologic cancer at an urban, public hospital.

Eijean Wu, Anna Rogers, Lingyun Ji, Richard Sposto, Terry Church, Lynda Roman, Debu Tripathy, Yvonne G Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical Treatment Intensity at the End of Life in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. End-of-Life Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eijean WuLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Anna RogersLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Lingyun JiLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Richard SpostoLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Terry ChurchLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Lynda RomanLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Debu TripathyLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA.
Yvonne G LinLos Angeles County and University of Southern California Healthcare Network; University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and Ventura County Medical System, Ventura, CA yglin@alum.mit.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
The critical role of GRP78 for endometrial cancer development and progressionK08CA175161 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LIN-LIU, YVONNE GAIL · 2014 to 2014
$176k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA175161NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUse of oncology-related services is increasingly scrutinized, yet precisely which services are actually rendered to patients, particularly at the end of life, is unknown. This study characterizes the end-of-life use of medical services by patients with gynecologic cancer at a safety-net hospital.

methodsOncologic history and metrics of medical use (eg, hospitalizations, chemotherapy infusions, procedures) for patients with gynecologic oncology who died between December 2006 and February 2012 were evaluated. Mixed-effect regression models were used to test time effects and construct usage summaries.

resultsAmong 116 subjects, cervical cancer accounted for the most deaths (42%). The median age at diagnosis was 55 years; 63% were Hispanic, and 65% had advanced disease. Only 34% died in hospice care. The median times from do not resuscitate/do not intubate documentation and from last therapeutic intervention to death were 9 days and 55 days, respectively. Significant time effects for all services (eg, hospitalizations, diagnostics, procedures, treatments, clinic appointments) were detected during the patient's final year (P < .001), with the most dramatic changes occurring during the last 2 months. Patients with longer duration of continuity of care used significantly fewer resources toward the end of life.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first report enumerating medical services obtained by patients with gynecologic cancer in a large, public hospital during the end of life. Marked changes in interventions in the patient's final 2 months highlight the need for cost-effective, evidence-based metrics for delivering cancer care. Our data emphasize continuity of care as a significant determinant of oncologic resource use during this critical period.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCitiesFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansMiddle AgedSafety-net ProvidersTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID25604595
PMCPMC4371122
OpenAlexW2135976645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.