Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604576›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2015

Clinical observation of the time course of raised intracranial pressure after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Yuhua Lv, Dayan Wang, Jin Lei, Ge Tan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhua LvDepartment of Neurology, Chongqing Banan Hospital, Chongqing, 401320, China, Lvyuhua.kiko@gmail.com.
Dayan Wang
Jin Lei
Ge Tan
Chongqing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Chongqing · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The time course of intracranial pressure (ICP) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is not well known. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the occurrence and the dynamic variation of raised ICP post-SAH. ICP was prospectively studied in 120 patients with SAH who were admitted to neurocritical care within 24 h of hemorrhage. Patients underwent continuous ICP monitoring for at least 7 days, unless they died. Clinical status on admission, radiographic tests, treatment details and neurological outcome on discharge were analyzed in relation to ICP. The highest daily mean ICP and the day when ICP reduced to normal levels were assessed. Of the 120 patients studied, 112 (93.3 %) encountered ICP elevation whilst in hospital. The daily mean ICP was higher in Hunt and Hess grades IV-V patients than grades I-III patients (P = 0.01). The elevated ICP remained at a higher level for the initial 3 days (grades I-III patients) or 4 days (grades IV-V patients), after which the pressure decreased towards normal levels. The in-patient mortality was significantly increased in the high ICP variability group (P = 0.001), which was divided by the cutoff point using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Raised ICP mainly occurs within 8 days post-SAH, especially the initial 3-4 days. Those highlight the need for earlier management of ICP after SAH.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansIntracranial HypertensionKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSubarachnoid HemorrhageTime FactorsTomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25604576
OpenAlexW2008787455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.