Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604349›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2015

Ontogeny of septohippocampal modulation of delay eyeblink conditioning.

Thomas C Harmon, John H Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas C HarmonDepartment of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242.
John H Freeman

Funding

Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Ontogeny of Eyeblink ConditioningR01NS038890 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FREEMAN, JOHN H · 2000 to 2014
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS NS038890NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of disrupting the septohippocampal theta system on the developmental emergence of delay eyeblink conditioning. Theta oscillations are defined as electroencephalographic (EEG) waveforms with a frequency between 3-8 Hz. Hippocampal theta oscillations are generated by inputs from the entorhinal cortex and the medial septum. Theta activity has been shown to facilitate learning in a variety of paradigms, including delay eyeblink conditioning. Lesions of the medial septum disrupt theta activity and slow the rate at which delay eyeblink conditioning is learned (Berry & Thompson, [1979] Science 200:1298-1300). The role of the septohippocampal theta system in the ontogeny of eyeblink conditioning has not been examined. In the current study, infant rats received an electrolytic lesion of the medial septum on postnatal day (P) 12. Rats were later given eyeblink conditioning for 6 sessions with an auditory conditioned stimulus on P17-19, P21-23, or P24-26. Lesions impaired eyeblink conditioning on P21-23 and P24-26 but not on P17-19. The results suggest that the septohippocampal system comes online to facilitate acquisition of eyeblink conditioning between P19 and P21. Developmental changes in septohippocampal modulation of the cerebellum may play a significant role in the ontogeny of eyeblink conditioning.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBlinkingConditioning, EyelidFemaleHippocampusMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansSeptal NucleiTheta Rhythmassociative learningcerebellumdevelopmenteyelid conditioningrat pupseptumtheta

Identifiers

PMID25604349
PMCPMC4336210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.