Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604319›Full record

Observational studyClinical rheumatology2015

The correlation between radiographic knee OA and clinical symptoms--do we know everything?

Amir Herman, Ofir Chechik, Ganit Segal, Yona Kosashvili, Ran Lador, Moshe Salai, Amit Mor, Avi Elbaz, Amir Haim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00767780 (The Effect of a New Biomechanical Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00767780 completednot on this map

The Effect of a New Biomechanical Device

TypeobservationalSponsorAssaf-Harofeh Medical CenterRan2006 to 2008Enrolled200ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Joint Replacement, FracturesArmsAPOS biomechanical gait system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What is the current evidence of the impact on quality of life whilst waiting for management/treatment of orthopaedic/musculoskeletal complaints? A systematic scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amir HermanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. amirherm@gmail.com.
Ofir ChechikDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ganit SegalAposTherapy Research Group, Herzliya, Israel.
Yona KosashviliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Ran LadorDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Moshe SalaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amit MorAposTherapy Research Group, Herzliya, Israel.
Avi ElbazAposTherapy Research Group, Herzliya, Israel.
Amir HaimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILReichman University · ILRabin Medical Center · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThis study aims to evaluate the correlations between common clinical osteoarthritis (OA) diagnostic tools in order to determine the value of each. A secondary goal was to investigate the influence of gender differences on the findings. Five hundred and eighteen patients with knee OA were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, short form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, and plain radiographs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different domains of the WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires between genders and the radiographic scale. Higher knee OA x-ray grade were associated with worse clinical outcome: for women, higher scores for the WOMAC pain, function and final scores and lower scores in the SF-36 final score; in men, lower SF-36 overall and physical domains scores. Gender differences were found in all clinical scores that were tested, with women having worse clinical scores for similar radiographic grading (p values <0.001). Knee radiographs for OA have an important role in the clinical evaluation of the patient. Patients with higher levels of knee OA in x-ray have a higher probability of having a worse clinical score in the WOMAC and SF-36 scores. The gender differences suggest that for similar knee OA x-ray grade, women's clinical scores are lower.

trial registrationNCT00767780.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationSex FactorsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeQuality of LifeRadiographyRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesFunctionKnee osteoarthritisPainQuality of lifeX-ray

Identifiers

PMID25604319
OpenAlexW2042392979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.