Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25604307›Full record

Trial reportDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Operation time for suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial].

J Hipp, J Laniewski, E Gitei, S Elhabash, O Akkermann, B Gerdes

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J HippKlinik für Allgemeinchirurgie - Viszeral-,Thorax- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Klinikum Minden, Hans-Nolte-Str. 1, 32429, Minden, Deutschland.
J Laniewski
E Gitei
S Elhabash
O Akkermann
B Gerdes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade new innovative minimally invasive techniques (e.g. transvaginal cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been developed to reduce operative trauma, postoperative pain and to achieve better cosmetic results. Nevertheless, most of these techniques are more difficult and time-consuming than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). A new approach, the Minden technique for combined suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy (MI-CHE) has been proven to provide a very good cosmetic outcome with reduced operative trauma. The aim of this study was to survey whether MI-CHE prolongs operation times to a relevant degree compared to CLC.

methodsA total of 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized between both techniques. The duration of the operation and other perioperative data were recorded. Surgery was performed by four resident surgeons who had not yet performed any technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, neither MI-CHE nor CLC but were assisted by the same senior staff surgeon in all cases. The two patient groups showed no differences in age, gender and body mass index. The study was registered (DRKS00003271). Non-inferiority was tested using 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

resultsThe mean operation time was shorter by - 4.2 min (95% CI, + 6.4 min to - 14.8 min) in the MI-CHE as compared to the CLC group (65.5 min versus 69.7 min). There were no open conversions but in one patient intestinal injury occurred during the umbilical mini-laparotomy. There were no differences in patient satisfaction and perioperative pain between both procedures.

conclusionThe MI-CHE, which provides very good cosmetic results, is not more time-consuming than CLC. Additionally, it seems to be safe and not more difficult to learn than CLC.

Indexed as

Operative TimeCholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicEstheticsFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyLearning CurveMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesUmbilicus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.