ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2015
Cardiac Arrest in Children: Relation to Resuscitation and Outcome.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized pediatric emergency nursing and Its effects on successful resuscitation and adverse reactions in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Outcomes of pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the emergency department of a tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Neurologic Outcomes Following Care in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Current treatment options in pediatrics · 2017Article
- Pediatric cardiac arrest in the emergency department: Outcome is related to the time of admission.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the outcome of cardiac arrest in pediatric intensive care unit in relation to event variables.
methodsThe study included children with cardiac arrest who required resuscitation in pediatric intensive care unit over 1 y period. Two outcome variables were measured. The first was success [return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)] and the second was survival to discharge from pediatric intensive care unit.
resultsOut of 700 admissions, 172 (24.6 %) patients developed cardiac arrest that required resuscitation. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 78 cases (45.3 %), 25 patients (14.5 %) survived to discharge and 94 patients (54.7 %) did not respond to resuscitations. Success and survival rates were significantly higher in cases resuscitated for ≤ 20 min than in cases resuscitated for > 20 min (100 % and 33.3 % vs. 32.4 % and 10.1 % respectively). Success and survival rates were better in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation than those not (48.1 % and 17.8 % vs. 37.2 % and 4.7 % respectively). Defibrillation was successful in 10 cases (25 %) and survival was in 1 case (0.5 %) and out of survivors, 80 % had good neurological outcome.
conclusionsThe frequency of inhospital cardiac arrest was 24.6 % where 45.3 % of them achieved successful resuscitation. The duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (<20 min) and mechanical ventilation were an indicator for better success and survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25604246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.