Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25603503›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2015

Structure-guided design of selective Epac1 and Epac2 agonists.

Frank Schwede, Daniela Bertinetti, Carianne N Langerijs, Michael A Hadders, Hans Wienk, Johanne H Ellenbroek, Eelco J P de Koning, Johannes L Bos, Friedrich W Herberg, Hans-Gottfried Genieser and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Altered GScience advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Epac2-mediated synaptic insertion of CaNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. cAMP binding to closed pacemaker ion channels is cooperative.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Frank SchwedeBIOLOG Life Science Institute, Bremen, Germany.
Daniela BertinettiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Carianne N LangerijsGalapagos BV, CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael A HaddersDepartment of Chemistry, Laboratory of Crystal and Structural Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans WienkDepartment of Chemistry, NMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johanne H EllenbroekDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eelco J P de KoningDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Hubrecht Institute/KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johannes L BosMolecular Cancer Research and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Friedrich W HerbergDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Hans-Gottfried GenieserBIOLOG Life Science Institute, Bremen, Germany.
Richard A J JanssenGalapagos BV, CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Holger RehmannMolecular Cancer Research and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Epac1 Plays a Critical Role in Bacterial Adhesion during RickettsiosesR01AI121012 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GONG, BIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The second messenger cAMP is known to augment glucose-induced insulin secretion. However, its downstream targets in pancreatic β-cells have not been unequivocally determined. Therefore, we designed cAMP analogues by a structure-guided approach that act as Epac2-selective agonists both in vitro and in vivo. These analogues activate Epac2 about two orders of magnitude more potently than cAMP. The high potency arises from increased affinity as well as increased maximal activation. Crystallographic studies demonstrate that this is due to unique interactions. At least one of the Epac2-specific agonists, Sp-8-BnT-cAMPS (S-220), enhances glucose-induced insulin secretion in human pancreatic cells. Selective targeting of Epac2 is thus proven possible and may be an option in diabetes treatment.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCell Line, TumorCrystallography, X-RayCyclic AMPDrug DesignGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansInsulinInsulin SecretionIslets of LangerhansModels, MolecularProtein BindingCyclic AMPGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsInsulinRAPGEF3 protein, humanRAPGEF4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25603503
PMCPMC4300089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.