Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25603284›Full record

ArticleBiological psychology2015

Allostatic dysregulation of natural reward processing in prescription opioid misuse: autonomic and attentional evidence.

Eric L Garland, Brett Froeliger, Matthew O Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Intact responses to non-drug rewards in long-term opioid maintenance treatment.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Acute fentanyl induces opposing directions of changes in tonic and phasic dopamine release patterns and impairs Pavlovian task performance.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Behavioral preference for viewing drugPsychological medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric L GarlandUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: eric.garland@socwk.utah.edu.
Brett FroeligerMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Matthew O HowardUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.

Funding

Targeting Military Opioid Misuse with Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery EnhancementR34DA037005 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GARLAND, ERIC LEE · 2013 to 2015
$667k
Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement For Chronic Pain Patients Receiving OpiR03DA032517 · NIDA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GARLAND, ERIC LEE · 2011 to 2012
$74k
NIDA NIH HHS DA032517NIDA NIH HHS DA037005NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA032517NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA037005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain patients who misuse prescription opioids may suffer from allostatic dysregulation of natural reward processing. Hence, this study examined whether prescription opioid misusers with chronic pain (n=72) evidenced decreased natural reward responsiveness relative to non-misusers with chronic pain (n=26). Subjects completed a dot probe task containing pain-related, opioid-related, and natural reward stimuli while attentional bias (AB) scores and heart rate variability (HRV) responses were assessed. Compared to non-misusers, misusers evidenced significantly more attenuated HRV responses to opioid, pain, and natural reward cues presented during the dot probe task. These significant between-groups differences in HRV were largest during attention to natural reward cues, but became non-significant in a sensitivity analysis controlling for opioid dosing. In addition, non-misusers evidenced an AB toward natural reward cues, whereas misusers did not. Findings suggest that opioid misusers exhibit attentional and autonomic deficits during reward processing.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAllostasisAnalgesics, OpioidAttentionChronic PainCuesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOpioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug MisuseAnalgesics, OpioidAttentional biasChronic painHeart-rate variabilityOpioid misuseReward processing

Identifiers

PMID25603284
PMCPMC4336801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.