Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25603120›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The information value of non-genetic inheritance in plants and animals.

Sinead English, Ido Pen, Nicholas Shea, Tobias Uller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Maternal developmental history alters transfer of circadian clock genes to offspring in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A generalised approach to the study and understanding of adaptive evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The evolution of social learning as phenotypic cue integration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Evolution of epigenetic transmission when selection acts on fecundity versus viability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Different perspectives on non-genetic inheritance illustrate the versatile utility of the Price equation in evolutionary biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The evolution of early-life effects on social behaviour-why should social adversity carry over to the future?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sinead EnglishEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ido PenTheoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nicholas SheaDepartment of Philosophy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tobias UllerEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parents influence the development of their offspring in many ways beyond the transmission of DNA. This includes transfer of epigenetic states, nutrients, antibodies and hormones, and behavioural interactions after birth. While the evolutionary consequences of such non-genetic inheritance are increasingly well understood, less is known about how inheritance mechanisms evolve. Here, we present a simple but versatile model to explore the adaptive evolution of non-genetic inheritance. Our model is based on a switch mechanism that produces alternative phenotypes in response to different inputs, including genes and non-genetic factors transmitted from parents and the environment experienced during development. This framework shows how genetic and non-genetic inheritance mechanisms and environmental conditions can act as cues by carrying correlational information about future selective conditions. Differential use of these cues is manifested as different degrees of genetic, parental or environmental morph determination. We use this framework to evaluate the conditions favouring non-genetic inheritance, as opposed to genetic determination of phenotype or within-generation plasticity, by applying it to two putative examples of adaptive non-genetic inheritance: maternal effects on seed germination in plants and transgenerational phase shift in desert locusts. Our simulation models show how the adaptive value of non-genetic inheritance depends on its mechanism, the pace of environmental change, and life history characteristics.

Indexed as

AnimalsHeredityPlantsSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID25603120
PMCPMC4300080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.