Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25602893›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

When advocacy obscures accuracy online: digital pandemics of public health misinformation through an antifluoride case study.

Brittany Seymour, Rebekah Getman, Avinash Saraf, Lily H Zhang, Elsbeth Kalenderian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Geospatial analysis of misinformation in COVID-19 related tweets.Applied geography (Sevenoaks, England) · 2021
    Article
  11. [Contrasting Misinformation and Real-Information Dissemination Network Structures on Social Media During a Health Emergency].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An assessment of fluoride related posts on Instagram.Health promotion perspectives · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Containing health myths in the age of viral misinformation.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brittany SeymourBrittany Seymour and Elsbeth Kalenderian are with the Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA. Rebekah Getman is with the Harvard Global Health Institute, Cambridge, MA. Avinash Saraf and Lily H. Zhang are students at Harvard College, Cambridge, and interns at the Harvard Global Health Institute, Cambridge.
Rebekah Getman
Avinash Saraf
Lily H Zhang
Elsbeth Kalenderian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn an antifluoridation case study, we explored digital pandemics and the social spread of scientifically inaccurate health information across the Web, and we considered the potential health effects.

methodsUsing the social networking site Facebook and the open source applications Netvizz and Gephi, we analyzed the connectedness of antifluoride networks as a measure of social influence, the social diffusion of information based on conversations about a sample scientific publication as a measure of spread, and the engagement and sentiment about the publication as a measure of attitudes and behaviors.

resultsOur study sample was significantly more connected than was the social networking site overall (P<.001). Social diffusion was evident; users were forced to navigate multiple pages or never reached the sample publication being discussed 60% and 12% of the time, respectively. Users had a 1 in 2 chance of encountering negative and nonempirical content about fluoride unrelated to the sample publication.

conclusionsNetwork sociology may be as influential as the information content and scientific validity of a particular health topic discussed using social media. Public health must employ social strategies for improved communication management.

Indexed as

Consumer AdvocacyCommunicationFluoridationHumansInternetOrganizational Case StudiesSocial MediaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25602893
PMCPMC4330844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.