Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25602710›Full record

Trial reportProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry2015

Evaluation of the dopamine β-hydroxylase (DβH) inhibitor nepicastat in participants who meet criteria for cocaine use disorder.

Richard De La Garza, Marcy J Bubar, Crystal L Carbone, F Gerard Moeller, Thomas F Newton, Noelle C Anastasio, Tod A Harper, David L Ware, Michael A Fuller, Gaylyn J Holstein and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard De La GarzaMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: rg12@bcm.edu.
Marcy J BubarCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Crystal L CarboneCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
F Gerard MoellerCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Addiction Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Thomas F NewtonMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Noelle C AnastasioCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Tod A HarperDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
David L WareCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Michael A FullerCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Gaylyn J HolsteinCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Jason B JayroeCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Stephen I BandakBiotie Therapies, Inc. (formerly Synosia Therapeutics), South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kirsten Z ReimanBiotie Therapies, Inc. (formerly Synosia Therapeutics), South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ann C NealeBiotie Therapies, Inc. (formerly Synosia Therapeutics), South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Lesley B PickfordBiotie Therapies, Inc. (formerly Synosia Therapeutics), South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kathryn A CunninghamCenter for Addiction Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USBaylor College of Medicine · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Addiction and the Neuropharmacology of PsychostimulantsK05DA020087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI CUNNINGHAM, KATHRYN A. · 2005 to 2015
$1.3M
Serotonin, Impulsivity, and Substance AbuseK02DA000403 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2000 to 2011
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA000403NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA020087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the potent and selective dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DβH) inhibitor nepicastat would have minimal effects on cardiovascular and pharmacokinetic parameters associated with cocaine administration and would reduce the positive subjective effects produced by cocaine. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient study of oral nepicastat (0, 80 and 160mg) concurrent with intravenous (IV) cocaine (0, 10, 20 and 40mg) in non-treatment seeking participants who metcriteria for cocaine use disorder. Safety analyses revealed that nepicastat was well-tolerated and there were no differences in adverse events observed after nepicastat plus cocaine vs. cocaine alone. In addition, the pharmacokinetic properties of cocaine administration were not altered by nepicastat treatment. Cocaine-induced cardiovascular and subjective effects were evaluated for completers in the cohort randomized to nepicastat (n=13) using a within-subjects statistical analysis strategy. Specifically, the cardiovascular and subjective effects of cocaine were assessed in the presence of placebo (0mg), 80mg of nepicastat or 160mg of nepicastat on study Days 4, 8 and 12, respectively. Analyses revealed a main effect of nepicastat to reduce several cocaine-induced positive subjective effects. Taken together, these data indicate that nepicastat is safe when co-administered with cocaine and may suppress its positive subjective effects, and may be viable as a pharmacotherapy for treatment of cocaine use disorder.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceCardiovascular SystemCocaine-Related DisordersDopamine beta-HydroxylaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImidazolesMalePain MeasurementPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReinforcement, PsychologyDopamine beta-HydroxylaseEnzyme InhibitorsImidazolesnepicastatThionesCocaineDopamine-β-hydroxylaseNepicastatSYN117

Identifiers

PMID25602710
PMCPMC4777897
OpenAlexW2071095715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.