Trial reportJAMA2015
Chlorhexidine bathing and health care-associated infections: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02033187 (Phase 4 Study of the Impact of Daily Bathing With Chlorhexidine-gluconate Impregnated Bathing Cloths on Nosocomial Infections in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 4 Study of the Impact of Daily Bathing With Chlorhexidine-gluconate Impregnated Bathing Cloths on Nosocomial Infections in Critically Ill Patients
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevention of infection in aortic or aortoiliac peripheral arterial reconstruction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- [Chlorhexidine bathing in intensive care units for the prevention of nosocomial infections. A systematic review].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Chlorhexidine bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of hospital-acquired infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The impact of chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Evidence for the effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing and health care-associated infections among adult intensive care patients: a trial sequential meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Pooled it
- Reducing Clostridium difficile in the Inpatient Setting: A Systematic Review of the Adherence to and Effectiveness of C. difficile Prevention Bundles.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- Chlorhexidine bathing and health care-associated infections among adult intensive care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Pooled it
- Prevention of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections through chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated washcloth bathing in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised crossover trials.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2016Pooled it
- The efficacy of daily chlorhexidine bathing for preventing healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care units.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2016Trial
- Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing of adult patients in intensive care units in São Paulo, Brazil: Impact on the incidence of healthcare-associated infection.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesTrial
- Does alternate-day bathing with 2% chlorhexidine improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Humanistic care in the ICU: effects on patient dignity, delirium and family satisfaction - a non-randomised clinical trial protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Practice guideline on the prevention and treatment of central line-associated bloodstream infection: Part 2 - Treatment.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Daily Chlorhexidine Bathing for the Prevention of Nosocomial Infections in Critically Ill Patients (CLEAN-IT): a multicentre, cluster-randomised, crossover trial.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by[Not Available].2015
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceDaily bathing of critically ill patients with the broad-spectrum, topical antimicrobial agent chlorhexidine is widely performed and may reduce health care-associated infections.
objectiveTo determine if daily bathing of critically ill patients with chlorhexidine decreases the incidence of health care-associated infections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA pragmatic cluster randomized, crossover study of 9340 patients admitted to 5 adult intensive care units of a tertiary medical center in Nashville, Tennessee, from July 2012 through July 2013.
interventionsUnits performed once-daily bathing of all patients with disposable cloths impregnated with 2% chlorhexidine or nonantimicrobial cloths as a control. Bathing treatments were performed for a 10-week period followed by a 2-week washout period during which patients were bathed with nonantimicrobial disposable cloths, before crossover to the alternate bathing treatment for 10 weeks. Each unit crossed over between bathing assignments 3 times during the study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary prespecified outcome was a composite of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and Clostridium difficile infections. Secondary outcomes included rates of clinical cultures that tested positive for multidrug-resistant organisms, blood culture contamination, health care-associated bloodstream infections, and rates of the primary outcome by ICU.
resultsDuring the chlorhexidine bathing period, 55 infections occurred: 4 CLABSI, 21 CAUTI, 17 VAP, and 13 C difficile. During the control bathing period, 60 infections occurred: 4 CLABSI, 32 CAUTI, 8 VAP, and 16 C difficile. The primary outcome rate was 2.86 per 1000 patient-days during the chlorhexidine and 2.90 per 1000 patient-days during the control bathing periods (rate difference, -0.04; 95% CI, -1.10 to 1.01; P = .95). After adjusting for baseline variables, no difference between groups in the rate of the primary outcome was detected. Chlorhexidine bathing did not change rates of infection-related secondary outcomes including hospital-acquired bloodstream infections, blood culture contamination, or clinical cultures yielding multidrug-resistant organisms. In a prespecified subgroup analysis, no difference in the primary outcome was detected in any individual intensive care unit. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this pragmatic trial, daily bathing with chlorhexidine did not reduce the incidence of health care-associated infections including CLABSIs, CAUTIs, VAP, or C difficile. These findings do not support daily bathing of critically ill patients with chlorhexidine.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033187.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.