ReviewLab animal2015
Effects of experimental housing conditions on recovery of laboratory mice.
Review in Lab animal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of putative chronic pain models on locomotor activity in female and male mice.The journal of pain · 2026Article
- Paired versus Single Housing of Ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) Does Not Influence Experimental Outcomes of Influenza A Virus Pathogenesis Studies.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
- Social Housing of Postoperative Animals to Support Animal Welfare.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Review
- Shared stressful experiences affect social proximity in Merino sheep.Biology letters · 2023Article
- Wireless, fully implantable cardiac stimulation and recording with on-device computation for closed-loop pacing and defibrillation.Science advances · 2022Article
- The Impact of Activity-Based Interventions on Neuropathic Pain in Experimental Spinal Cord Injury.Cells · 2022Review
- Environmental Enrichment for Rats and Mice Housed in Laboratories: A Metareview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Recommendations for evaluation of bladder and bowel function in pre-clinical spinal cord injury research.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2020Review
- Suspected Lonely Mouse Syndrome as a Cage Effect in a Drug Safety Study.Journal of veterinary medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The beneficial effects of environment and social support during disease recovery in humans are widely accepted. Because laboratory mice are social animals and are highly motivated to interact with each other and with their environment, it is very likely that environmental and social factors are also beneficial to their recovery from experimental interventions or spontaneous diseases. The beneficial effects of enriched environments have been particularly well analyzed in the field of brain disorders, but several studies suggest that positive social contact and a complex and familiar environment may also support recovery from injury, from invasive procedures such as surgery or from spontaneously occurring diseases. The author reviews relevant publications on the effects of environment and social housing on recovery from disease or surgery in laboratory mice and other rodents. She concludes that in addition to promoting animal welfare, provision of optimal experimental housing conditions might also contribute to the clinical relevance of preclinical animal models by more closely simulating the environmental and social characteristics of disease recovery in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.