Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25602379›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development of genetic markers in Eucalyptus species by target enrichment and exome sequencing.

Modhumita Ghosh Dasgupta, Veeramuthu Dharanishanthi, Ishangi Agarwal, Konstantin V Krutovsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Modhumita Ghosh DasguptaDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, P.B. No. 1061, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore-641002, India.
Veeramuthu DharanishanthiDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, P.B. No. 1061, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore-641002, India.
Ishangi AgarwalGenotypic Technology Private Limited, #2/13, Balaji Complex, Poojari Layout, 80, Feet Road, R. M. V. 2nd Stage, Bangalore-560094, India.
Konstantin V KrutovskyDepartment of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Büsgen Institute, Georg August University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany; Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, 2138 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2138, United States of America; N.I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119333, Russia; Genome Research and Education Center, Siberian Federal University, 50a/2 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding · INUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of next-generation sequencing has facilitated large-scale discovery, validation and assessment of genetic markers for high density genotyping. The present study was undertaken to identify markers in genes supposedly related to wood property traits in three Eucalyptus species. Ninety four genes involved in xylogenesis were selected for hybridization probe based nuclear genomic DNA target enrichment and exome sequencing. Genomic DNA was isolated from the leaf tissues and used for on-array probe hybridization followed by Illumina sequencing. The raw sequence reads were trimmed and high-quality reads were mapped to the E. grandis reference sequence and the presence of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/ deletions (InDels) were identified across the three species. The average read coverage was 216X and a total of 2294 SNVs and 479 InDels were discovered in E. camaldulensis, 2383 SNVs and 518 InDels in E. tereticornis, and 1228 SNVs and 409 InDels in E. grandis. Additionally, SNV calling and InDel detection were conducted in pair-wise comparisons of E. tereticornis vs. E. grandis, E. camaldulensis vs. E. tereticornis and E. camaldulensis vs. E. grandis. This study presents an efficient and high throughput method on development of genetic markers for family- based QTL and association analysis in Eucalyptus.

Indexed as

EucalyptusExomeGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25602379
PMCPMC4300219
OpenAlexW2050777557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.