Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25602077›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

The role and interaction of imprinted genes in human fetal growth.

Gudrun E Moore, Miho Ishida, Charalambos Demetriou, Lara Al-Olabi, Lydia J Leon, Anna C Thomas, Sayeda Abu-Amero, Jennifer M Frost, Jaime L Stafford, Yao Chaoqun and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Polar Overdominance Inheritance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Maternal-fetal conflict and the timing of birth.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gudrun E MooreGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK gudrun.moore@ucl.ac.uk.
Miho IshidaGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Charalambos DemetriouGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Lara Al-OlabiGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Lydia J LeonGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Anna C ThomasGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Sayeda Abu-AmeroGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Jennifer M FrostGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Jaime L StaffordGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Yao ChaoqunGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Andrew J DuncanGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Rachel BaigelGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Marina BrimioulleGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Isabel Iglesias-PlatasGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Sophia ApostolidouGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Reena AggarwalGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
John C WhittakerNoncommunicable Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Argyro SyngelakiHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Kypros H NicolaidesHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Lesley ReganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London W2 1NY, UK.
David MonkGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Philip StanierGenetics and Epigenetics in Health and Diseases Section, Genetics and Genomic Medicine Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
University College London · GBHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine · GBImperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801438Medical Research Council G1001689Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the genetic input for fetal growth will help to understand common, serious complications of pregnancy such as fetal growth restriction. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic process that silences one parental allele, resulting in monoallelic expression. Imprinted genes are important in mammalian fetal growth and development. Evidence has emerged showing that genes that are paternally expressed promote fetal growth, whereas maternally expressed genes suppress growth. We have assessed whether the expression levels of key imprinted genes correlate with fetal growth parameters during pregnancy, either early in gestation, using chorionic villus samples (CVS), or in term placenta. We have found that the expression of paternally expressing insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), its receptor IGF2R, and the IGF2/IGF1R ratio in CVS tissues significantly correlate with crown-rump length and birthweight, whereas term placenta expression shows no correlation. For the maternally expressing pleckstrin homology-like domain family A, member 2 (PHLDA2), there is no correlation early in pregnancy in CVS but a highly significant negative relationship in term placenta. Analysis of the control of imprinted expression of PHLDA2 gave rise to a maternally and compounded grand-maternally controlled genetic effect with a birthweight increase of 93/155 g, respectively, when one copy of the PHLDA2 promoter variant is inherited. Expression of the growth factor receptor-bound protein 10 (GRB10) in term placenta is significantly negatively correlated with head circumference. Analysis of the paternally expressing delta-like 1 homologue (DLK1) shows that the paternal transmission of type 1 diabetes protective G allele of rs941576 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) results in significantly reduced birth weight (-132 g). In conclusion, we have found that the expression of key imprinted genes show a strong correlation with fetal growth and that for both genetic and genomics data analyses, it is important not to overlook parent-of-origin effects.

Indexed as

Birth WeightCalcium-Binding ProteinsChorionic VilliFemaleFetal DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomic ImprintingHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPlacentaPregnancyReceptors, SomatomedinCalcium-Binding ProteinsDLK1 protein, humanIGF2 protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNuclear ProteinsReceptors, SomatomedinTSSC3 proteinbirth weightchorionic villus samplingfetal growth restrictiongenomic imprintingplacentatype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID25602077
PMCPMC4305174
OpenAlexW2141298577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.