Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25602013›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2015

Recording, labeling, and transfection of single neurons in deep brain structures.

Bowen Dempsey, Anita J Turner, Sheng Le, Qi-Jian Sun, Lama Bou Farah, Andrew M Allen, Ann K Goodchild, Simon McMullan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Student's Guide to Neural Circuit Tracing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  8. Viruses leave their stamp on single cells.Nature biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bowen DempseyAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.
Anita J TurnerAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.
Sheng LeAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.
Qi-Jian SunAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.
Lama Bou FarahAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.
Andrew M AllenDepartment of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, VIC, Australia.
Ann K GoodchildAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.
Simon McMullanAustralian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic tools that permit functional or connectomic analysis of neuronal circuits are rapidly transforming neuroscience. The key to deployment of such tools is selective transfection of target neurons, but to date this has largely been achieved using transgenic animals or viral vectors that transduce subpopulations of cells chosen according to anatomical rather than functional criteria. Here, we combine single-cell transfection with conventional electrophysiological recording techniques, resulting in three novel protocols that can be used for reliable delivery of conventional dyes or genetic material in vitro and in vivo. We report that techniques based on single cell electroporation yield reproducible transfection in vitro, and offer a simple, rapid and reliable alternative to established dye-labeling techniques in vivo, but are incompatible with targeted transfection in deep brain structures. In contrast, we show that intracellular electrophoresis of plasmid DNA transfects brainstem neurons recorded up to 9 mm deep in the anesthetized rat. The protocols presented here require minimal, if any, modification to recording hardware, take seconds to deploy, and yield high recovery rates in vitro (dye labeling: 89%, plasmid transfection: 49%) and in vivo (dye labeling: 66%, plasmid transfection: 27%). They offer improved simplicity compared to the juxtacellular labeling technique and for the first time offer genetic manipulation of functionally characterized neurons in previously inaccessible brain regions.

Indexed as

Electroporationgene deliveryjuxtacellularlabeling

Identifiers

PMID25602013
PMCPMC4387759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.