Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25601991›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2015

Cell type-dependent changes in CdSe/ZnS quantum dot uptake and toxic endpoints.

Bella B Manshian, Stefaan J Soenen, Abdullah Al-Ali, Andy Brown, Nicole Hondow, John Wills, Gareth J S Jenkins, Shareen H Doak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Review of in vivo Toxicity of Quantum Dots in Animal Models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bella B Manshian*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK *Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK s.h.doak@swansea.ac.uk.
Stefaan J Soenen*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Abdullah Al-Ali*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Andy Brown*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Nicole Hondow*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
John Wills*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Gareth J S Jenkins*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Shareen H Doak*Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, Department of Medicine, Biomedical NMR Unit-MoSAIC, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium and Institute for Materials Research, SCaPE, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK s.h.doak@swansea.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicity of nanoparticles (NPs) is often correlated with the physicochemical characteristics of the materials. However, some discrepancies are noted in in-vitro studies on quantum dots (QDs) with similar physicochemical properties. This is partly related to variations in cell type. In this study, we show that epithelial (BEAS-2B), fibroblast (HFF-1), and lymphoblastoid (TK6) cells show different biological responses following exposure to QDs. These cells represented the 3 main portals of NP exposure: bronchial, skin, and circulatory. The uptake and toxicity of negatively and positively charged CdSe:ZnS QDs of the same core size but with different surface chemistries (carboxyl or amine polymer coatings) were investigated in full and reduced serum containing media following 1 and 3 cell cycles. Following thorough physicochemical characterization, cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and gross chromosomal damage were measured. Cellular damage mechanisms in the form of reactive oxygen species and the expression of inflammatory cytokines IL-8 and TNF-α were assessed. QDs uptake and toxicity significantly varied in the different cell lines. BEAS-2B cells demonstrated the highest level of QDs uptake yet displayed a strong resilience with minimal genotoxicity following exposure to these NPs. In contrast, HFF-1 and TK6 cells were more susceptible to toxicity and genotoxicity, respectively, as a result of exposure to QDs. Thus, this study demonstrates that in addition to nanomaterial physicochemical characterization, a clear understanding of cell type-dependent variation in uptake coupled to the inherently different capacities of the cell types to cope with exposure to these exogenous materials are all required to predict genotoxicity.

Indexed as

Quantum DotsCadmium CompoundsCell LineFlow CytometryHumansMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning TransmissionSelenium CompoundsSulfidesZinc CompoundsCadmium Compoundscadmium selenideSelenium CompoundsSulfidesZinc Compoundszinc sulfidecell typecellular uptakecytotoxicity, genotoxicitynanoparticlequantum dots

Identifiers

PMID25601991
PMCPMC4372665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.