ArticleFrontiers in genetics2014
Hybrid origin of European commercial pigs examined by an in-depth haplotype analysis on chromosome 1.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution under intensive industrial breeding: skull size and shape comparison between historic and modern pig lineages.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The Domestication of Wild Boar Could Result in a Relaxed Selection for Maintaining Olfactory Capacity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Integrating Multiple Database Resources to Elucidate the Gene Flow in Southeast Asian Pig Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genomic evidence for human-mediated introgressive hybridization and selection in the developed breed.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- The pig pangenome provides insights into the roles of coding structural variations in genetic diversity and adaptation.Genome research · 2023Article
- Genomic consequences of a century of inbreeding and isolation in the Danish wild boar population.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Unlocking the origins and biology of domestic animals using ancient DNA and paleogenomics.BMC biology · 2019Review
- Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Patterns of homozygosity in insular and continental goat breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Evidence for a primate origin of zoonotic Helicobacter suis colonizing domesticated pigs.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Population admixture in Chinese and European Sus scrofa.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Adult porcine genome-wide DNA methylation patterns support pigs as a biomedical model.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Editorial: Advances in Farm Animal Genomic Resources.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Efficacy of the porcine species in biomedical research.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although all farm animals have an original source of domestication, a large variety of modern breeds exist that are phenotypically highly distinct from the ancestral wild population. This phenomenon can be the result of artificial selection or gene flow from other sources into the domesticated population. The Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) has been domesticated at least twice in two geographically distinct regions during the Neolithic revolution when hunting shifted to farming. Prior to the establishment of the commercial European pig breeds we know today, some 200 years ago Chinese pigs were imported into Europe to improve local European pigs. Commercial European domesticated pigs are genetically more diverse than European wild boars, although historically the latter represents the source population for domestication. In this study we examine the cause of the higher diversity within the genomes of European commercial pigs compared to their wild ancestors by testing two different hypotheses. In the first hypothesis we consider that European commercial pigs are a mix of different European wild populations as a result of movement throughout Europe, hereby acquiring haplotypes from all over the European continent. As an alternative hypothesis, we examine whether the introgression of Asian haplotypes into European breeds during the Industrial Revolution caused the observed increase in diversity. By using re-sequence data for chromosome 1 of 136 pigs and wild boars, we show that an Asian introgression of about 20% into the genome of European commercial pigs explains the majority of the increase in genetic diversity. These findings confirm that the Asian hybridization, that was used to improve production traits of local breeds, left its signature in the genome of the commercial pigs we know today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.