Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25601401›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2015

Peaks cloaked in the mist: the landscape of mammalian replication origins.

Olivier Hyrien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. LSD1 is required for euchromatic origin firing and replication timing.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. FORK-seq: Single-Molecule Profiling of DNA Replication.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Olivier HyrienInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR8197 and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1024, 75005 Paris, France hyrien@biologie.ens.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication of mammalian genomes starts at sites termed replication origins, which historically have been difficult to locate as a result of large genome sizes, limited power of genetic identification schemes, and rareness and fragility of initiation intermediates. However, origins are now mapped by the thousands using microarrays and sequencing techniques. Independent studies show modest concordance, suggesting that mammalian origins can form at any DNA sequence but are suppressed by read-through transcription or that they can overlap the 5' end or even the entire gene. These results require a critical reevaluation of whether origins form at specific DNA elements and/or epigenetic signals or require no such determinants.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationReplication OriginAnimalsChromosome MappingGenomeHumans

Identifiers

PMID25601401
PMCPMC4298691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.