Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25601237›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2016

Reward Motivation Enhances Task Coding in Frontoparietal Cortex.

Joset A Etzel, Michael W Cole, Jeffrey M Zacks, Kendrick N Kay, Todd S Braver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Task and stimulus coding in the multiple-demand network.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rethinking Distraction.Visual cognition · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joset A EtzelWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Michael W ColeWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Jeffrey M ZacksWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Kendrick N KayWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Todd S BraverWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive ControlR37MH066078 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOMEDICAL IMAGING COMPUTER RESOURCESS10RR022984 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2009 to 2009
$1.9M
ENCODING AND REMEMBERING EVENTS ACROSS THE LIFE SPANR01AG031150 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZACKS, JEFFREY M · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR022984-01A1NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022984NIA NIH HHS 1R01AG031150NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031150NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH066078NIMH NIH HHS R37MH066078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward motivation often enhances task performance, but the neural mechanisms underlying such cognitive enhancement remain unclear. Here, we used a multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) approach to test the hypothesis that motivation-related enhancement of cognitive control results from improved encoding and representation of task set information. Participants underwent two fMRI sessions of cued task switching, the first under baseline conditions, and the second with randomly intermixed reward incentive and no-incentive trials. Information about the upcoming task could be successfully decoded from cue-related activation patterns in a set of frontoparietal regions typically associated with task control. More critically, MVPA classifiers trained on the baseline session had significantly higher decoding accuracy on incentive than non-incentive trials, with decoding improvement mediating reward-related enhancement of behavioral performance. These results strongly support the hypothesis that reward motivation enhances cognitive control, by improving the discriminability of task-relevant information coded and maintained in frontoparietal brain regions.

Indexed as

RewardAdultBrain MappingCuesExecutive FunctionFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationNeural PathwaysParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung Adultcognitive controlfMRImotivationMVPAprefrontal

Identifiers

PMID25601237
PMCPMC4785950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.