Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25600820›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2016

Performance Evaluation of a Salivary Amylase Biosensor for Stress Assessment in Military Field Research.

Henry T Peng, Erin Savage, Oshin Vartanian, Shane Smith, Shawn G Rhind, Catherine Tenn, Stephen Bjamason

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henry T PengDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erin SavageCanadian Forces Health Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Oshin VartanianDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shane SmithCanadian Forces Health Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shawn G RhindDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine TennDefence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada.
Stephen BjamasonDefence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada.
Defence Research and Development Canada · CACanadian Armed Forces · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA convenient biosensor for real-time measurement of biomarkers for in-field psychophysiological stress research and military operations is desirable. We evaluated a hand-held device for measuring salivary amylase as a stress marker in medical technicians undergoing combat casualty care training using two different modalities in operating room and field settings.

methodsSalivary amylase activity was measured by two biosensor methods: directly sampling saliva with a test strip placed under the tongue or pipetting a fixed volume of precollected saliva onto the test strip, followed by analyzing the sample on the strip using a biosensor. The two methods were compared for their accuracy and sensitivity to detect the stress response using an enzyme assay method as a standard.

resultsThe measurements from the under-the-tongue method were not as consistent with those from the standard assay method as the values obtained from the pipetting method. The under-the-tongue method did not detect any significant increase in the amylase activity due to stress in the operating room (P > 0.1), in contrast to the significant increases observed using the pipetting method and assay method with a significance level less than 0.05 and 0.1, respectively. Furthermore, the under-the-tongue method showed no increased amylase activity in the field testing, while both the pipetting method and assay method showed increased amylase activity in the same group (P < 0.1).

conclusionThe accuracy and consistency of the biosensors need to be improved when used to directly measure salivary amylase activity under the tongue for stress assessment in military medical training.

Indexed as

Military Personnelalpha-AmylasesBiosensing TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleSalivaStress, Psychologicalalpha-Amylasesbiosensormilitary medical trainingsalivary amylasestress

Identifiers

PMID25600820
PMCPMC6807148
OpenAlexW1932699166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.