Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25600685›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2015

DNA copy number concentration measured by digital and droplet digital quantitative PCR using certified reference materials.

Philippe Corbisier, Leonardo Pinheiro, Stéphane Mazoua, Anne-Marie Kortekaas, Pui Yan Jenny Chung, Tsvetelina Gerganova, Gert Roebben, Hendrik Emons, Kerry Emslie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Droplet Digital CRISPR for Nucleic Acid Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detection and quantification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. A droplet digital PCR assay for detection and quantification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe CorbisierInstitute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Retieseweg 111, 2440, Geel, Belgium, philippe.corbisier@ec.europa.eu.
Leonardo Pinheiro
Stéphane Mazoua
Anne-Marie Kortekaas
Pui Yan Jenny Chung
Tsvetelina Gerganova
Gert Roebben
Hendrik Emons
Kerry Emslie
European Commission · BENational Measurement Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value assignment for properties of six certified reference materials (ERM-AD623a-f), each containing a plasmid DNA solution ranging from 1 million to 10 copies per μL, by using digital PCR (dPCR) with the BioMark™ HD System (Fluidigm) has been verified by applying droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) using the QX100 system (Bio-Rad). One of the critical factors in the measurement of copy number concentrations by digital PCR is the partition volume. Therefore, we determined the average droplet volume by optical microscopy, revealing an average droplet volume that is 8 % smaller than the droplet volume used as the defined parameter in the QuantaSoft software version 1.3.2.0 (Bio-Rad) to calculate the copy number concentration. This observation explains why copy number concentrations estimated with ddPCR and using an average droplet volume predefined in the QuantaSoft software were systematically lower than those measured by dPCR, creating a significant bias between the values obtained by these two techniques. The difference was not significant anymore when the measured droplet volume of 0.834 nL was used to estimate copy number concentrations. A new version of QuantaSoft software (version 1.6.6.0320), which has since been released with Bio-Rad's new QX200 systems and QX100 upgrades, uses a droplet volume of 0.85 nL as a defined parameter to calculate copy number concentration.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsPolymerase Chain ReactionReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID25600685
PMCPMC4336415
OpenAlexW2006071334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.