Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25600411›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Effects of fungal infection on feeding and survival of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) on plant sugars.

Sopher N Ondiaka, Elizabeth W Masinde, Constantianus Jm Koenraadt, Willem Takken, Wolfgang R Mukabana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sopher N OndiakaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772 GPO, Nairobi, Kenya. sondiaka@yahoo.co.uk.
Elizabeth W MasindeInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772 GPO, Nairobi, Kenya. lizbarasa@yahoo.co.uk.
Constantianus Jm KoenraadtLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 8031, Wageningen, EH, 6700, The Netherlands. sander.koenraadt@wur.nl.
Willem TakkenLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 8031, Wageningen, EH, 6700, The Netherlands. willem.takken@wur.nl.
Wolfgang R MukabanaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772 GPO, Nairobi, Kenya. rmukabana@yahoo.co.uk.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEWageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae shows great promise for the control of adult malaria vectors. A promising strategy for infection of mosquitoes is supplying the fungus at plant feeding sites.

methodsWe evaluated the survival of fungus-exposed Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes (males and females) fed on 6% glucose and on sugars of Ricinus communis (Castor oil plant) and Parthenium hysterophorus (Santa Maria feverfew weed). Further, we determined the feeding propensity, quantity of sugar ingested and its digestion rate in the mosquitoes when fed on R. communis for 12 hours, one and three days post-exposure to fungus. The anthrone test was employed to detect the presence of sugar in each mosquito from which the quantity consumed and the digestion rates were estimated.

resultsFungus-exposed mosquitoes lived for significantly shorter periods than uninfected mosquitoes when both were fed on 6% glucose (7 versus 37 days), R. communis (7 versus 18 days) and P. hysterophorus (5 versus 7 days). Significantly fewer male and female mosquitoes, one and three days post-exposure to fungus, fed on R. communis compared to uninfected controls. Although the quantity of sugar ingested was similar between the treatment groups, fewer fungus-exposed than control mosquitoes ingested small, medium and large meals. Digestion rate was significantly slower in females one day after exposure to M. anisopliae compared to controls but remained the same in males. No change in digestion rate between treatments was observed three days after exposure.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that (a) entomopathogenic fungi strongly impact survival and sugar-feeding propensity of both sexes of the malaria vector An. gambiae but do not affect their potential to feed and digest meals, and (b) that plant sugar sources can be targeted as fungal delivery substrates. In addition, targeting males for population reduction using entomopathogenic fungi opens up a new strategy for mosquito vector control.

Indexed as

Insect VectorsAnimalsAnophelesAnthracenesAnthronesAsteraceaeCarbohydratesFeeding BehaviorFemaleMalariaMaleMetarhiziumMosquito ControlRicinusSurvival AnalysisAnthracenesanthroneAnthronesCarbohydrates

Identifiers

PMID25600411
PMCPMC4305255
OpenAlexW2143561092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.