Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25600307›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2015

Sacral anterior root stimulation improves bowel function in subjects with spinal cord injury.

M M Rasmussen, J Kutzenberger, K Krogh, F Zepke, C Bodin, B Domurath, P Christensen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02978638 (Restoration of Bladder and Bowel Function Using Electrical Stimulation and Block After Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02978638 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Restoration of Bladder and Bowel Function Using Electrical Stimulation and Block After Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchRan2014 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord Injury, Neurogenic Bladder, IncontinenceArmsFinetech Vocare Bladder System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Review
  7. Update on the Treatment of Autonomic Disorders.Current treatment options in neurology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gastrointestinal motility disorders in neurologic disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Bowel Dysfunction in Spinal Cord Injury.Current gastroenterology reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M M Rasmussen1] Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark [2] Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
J KutzenbergerDepartment of Neuro-Urology, Werner-Wicker-Klinik, Bad Wildungen-Reinhardhausen, Germany.
K KroghNeurogastroenterology Unit, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
F ZepkeDepartment of Neuro-Urology, Werner-Wicker-Klinik, Bad Wildungen-Reinhardhausen, Germany.
C BodinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
B DomurathDepartment of Neuro-Urology, Werner-Wicker-Klinik, Bad Wildungen-Reinhardhausen, Germany.
P ChristensenPelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKWerner-Wicker-Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional study.

objectiveTo evaluate the long-term effect of the sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) on neurogenic bowel dysfunction in a large, well defined spinal cord injury (SCI) cohort.

settingDepartment of Neuro-Urology, Bad Wildungen, Germany.

methodsSubjects undergone surgery at for SARS-SDAF (sacral deafferentation) between September 1986 and July 2011 (n=587) answered a questionnaire. In total, 277 SARS subjects were available for the baseline (recall) and follow-up comparison.

resultsMedian age was 49 years (range: 19-80), time from SCI to surgery was 10 years (range: 0-49) and from surgery to follow-up 13 (range: 1-25). Of the responders 73% used SARS for bowel emptying. On visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 (best), satisfaction with SARS was 10. Baseline and follow-up comparison showed a decline in the median VAS score 0-10 (worst) for bowel symptoms from 6 (range: 4-8) to 4 (range: 2-6), P<0.0001; median neurogenic bowel dysfunction score from 17 (range: 11-2) to 11 (range: 9-15), P<0.0001; median St Marks score from 4 (range: 0-7) to 4 (range: 0-5), P=0.01; and median Cleveland constipation score from 7 (range: 6-10) to 6 (range: 4-8), P<0.0001. Use of suppositories, digital evacuation and mini enema and subjects totally dependent on assistance during defecation were significantly lower after SARS.

conclusionsThe SARS has the potential to be one of the few treatment methods targeting multiple organ dysfunctions following SCI.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConstipationCross-Sectional StudiesElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurogenic BowelSacrumSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Nerve RootsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25600307
OpenAlexW2066636914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.