Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25599536›Full record

ReviewLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2015

Novel genotype-phenotype associations in human cancers enabled by advanced molecular platforms and computational analysis of whole slide images.

Lee A D Cooper, Jun Kong, David A Gutman, William D Dunn, Michael Nalisnik, Daniel J Brat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Integrating pathomics with radiomics and genomics for cancer prognosis: A brief review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lee A D Cooper1] Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA [2] Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA [3] Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jun KongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David A Gutman1] Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA [2] Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William D DunnDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael NalisnikDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel J Brat1] Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA [2] Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA [3] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Advanced Development of an Open-source Platform for Web-based Integrative Digital Image Analysis in CancerU24CA194362 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LEE, GUTMAN, DAVID ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Molecular Target Variation Across Environments and at Margins of GlioblastomaR01CA176659 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BRAT, DANIEL J, HADJIPANAYIS, CONSTANTINOS GEORGE · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Quantitative Analysis of GBM Invasion Mechanisms with New Imaging ProtocolK25CA181503 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KONG, JUN · 2014 to 2018
$592k
Multiscale Framework for Molecular Heterogeneity AnalysisK22LM011576 · NLM · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LEE · 2013 to 2015
$485k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA181503NCI NIH HHS K25CA181503NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176659NCI NIH HHS R01CA176659NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194362NLM NIH HHS K22 LM011576NLM NIH HHS K22LM011576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances in computing, imaging, and genomics have created new opportunities for exploring relationships between histology, molecular events, and clinical outcomes using quantitative methods. Slide scanning devices are now capable of rapidly producing massive digital image archives that capture histological details in high resolution. Commensurate advances in computing and image analysis algorithms enable mining of archives to extract descriptions of histology, ranging from basic human annotations to automatic and precisely quantitative morphometric characterization of hundreds of millions of cells. These imaging capabilities represent a new dimension in tissue-based studies, and when combined with genomic and clinical endpoints, can be used to explore biologic characteristics of the tumor microenvironment and to discover new morphologic biomarkers of genetic alterations and patient outcomes. In this paper, we review developments in quantitative imaging technology and illustrate how image features can be integrated with clinical and genomic data to investigate fundamental problems in cancer. Using motivating examples from the study of glioblastomas (GBMs), we demonstrate how public data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) can serve as an open platform to conduct in silico tissue-based studies that integrate existing data resources. We show how these approaches can be used to explore the relation of the tumor microenvironment to genomic alterations and gene expression patterns and to define nuclear morphometric features that are predictive of genetic alterations and clinical outcomes. Challenges, limitations, and emerging opportunities in the area of quantitative imaging and integrative analyses are also discussed.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesGenomicsHistocytochemistryNeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID25599536
PMCPMC4465352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.