Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25599443›Full record

ArticlePain2015

Cortical activity evoked by inoculation needle prick in infants up to one-year old.

Madeleine Verriotis, Lorenzo Fabrizi, Amy Lee, Sheryl Ledwidge, Judith Meek, Maria Fitzgerald

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nociception and the neonatal brain.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Improving the treatment of infant pain.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madeleine VerriotisDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Lorenzo Fabrizi
Amy Lee
Sheryl Ledwidge
Judith Meek
Maria Fitzgerald
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M006468/1Wellcome Trust 090245/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inoculation is one of the first and most common experiences of procedural pain in infancy. However, little is known about how needle puncture pain is processed by the central nervous system in children. In this study, we describe for the first time the event-related activity in the infant brain during routine inoculation using electroencephalography. Fifteen healthy term-born infants aged 1 to 2 months (n = 12) or 12 months (n = 5) were studied in an outpatient clinic. Pain behavior was scored using the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale. A distinct inoculation event-related vertex potential, consisting of 2 late negative-positive complexes, was observable in single trials after needle contact with the skin. The amplitude of both negative-positive components was significantly greater in the 12-month group. Both inoculation event-related potential amplitude and behavioral pain scores increased with age but the 2 measures were not correlated with each other. These components are the first recordings of brain activity in response to real-life needle pain in infants up to a year old. They provide new evidence of postnatal nociceptive processing and, combined with more traditional behavioral pain scores, offer a potentially more sensitive measure for testing the efficacy of analgesic protocols in this age group.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeedlesPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID25599443
PMCPMC4309489
OpenAlexW2149074747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.