ReviewFoodborne pathogens and disease2015
A possible route for foodborne transmission of Clostridium difficile?
Review in Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial community of civet excreta fed by robusta cherry coffee in Indonesian civet coffee production.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
- One Health Perspectives on Food Safety in Minimally Processed Vegetables and Fruits: From Farm to Fork.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Update on Commonly Used Molecular Typing Methods forMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Antibiotic Resistance in Selected Emerging Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens-An Issue of Concern?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Environment, Farm Animals and Foods as Sources ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Prospects for clinical applications of butyrate-producing bacteria.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2021Review
- Raw Animal Meats as Potential Sources ofFood science of animal resources · 2021Article
- Characterisation and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile ofJournal of veterinary research · 2020Article
- Review
- Novel Clade C-I Clostridium difficile strains escape diagnostic tests, differ in pathogenicity potential and carry toxins on extrachromosomal elements.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Prevalence ofKorean journal for food science of animal resources · 2018Article
- Antimicrobial Effect of Asiatic Acid AgainstFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- An Evaluation of Food as a Potential Source for Clostridium difficile Acquisition in Hospitalized Patients.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2016Article
- Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Spores of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and spores of food-poisoning strains of Clostridium perfringens show a similar prevalence in meats. Spores of both species are heat resistant and can survive cooking of foods. C. perfringens is a major cause of foodborne illness; studies are needed to determine whether C. difficile transmission by a similar route is a cause of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.