Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25599402›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2015

A method for calculating probabilities of fitness consequences for point mutations across the human genome.

Brad Gulko, Melissa J Hubisz, Ilan Gronau, Adam Siepel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 302 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Homozygous NonsenseJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Assessing the Clinical Relevance ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brad GulkoGraduate Field of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 000000018366589X
Melissa J HubiszDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Ilan GronauDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Adam Siepel1] Graduate Field of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. [2] Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Cornell University · USReichman University · IL

Funding

Computational methods for human genomic data integration: demography, selection,R01GM102192 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SIEPEL, ADAM CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM102192NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a new computational method for estimating the probability that a point mutation at each position in a genome will influence fitness. These 'fitness consequence' (fitCons) scores serve as evolution-based measures of potential genomic function. Our approach is to cluster genomic positions into groups exhibiting distinct 'fingerprints' on the basis of high-throughput functional genomic data, then to estimate a probability of fitness consequences for each group from associated patterns of genetic polymorphism and divergence. We have generated fitCons scores for three human cell types on the basis of public data from ENCODE. In comparison with conventional conservation scores, fitCons scores show considerably improved prediction power for cis regulatory elements. In addition, fitCons scores indicate that 4.2-7.5% of nucleotides in the human genome have influenced fitness since the human-chimpanzee divergence, and they suggest that recent evolutionary turnover has had limited impact on the functional content of the genome.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessGenome, HumanPoint MutationAnimalsCell LineEvolution, MolecularHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsPan troglodytesPolymorphism, GeneticProbabilityRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID25599402
PMCPMC4342276
OpenAlexW2106306904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.